Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSCX vs WCMLX
MSSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSCX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth I
Price$9.35
Change-$0.25 (-2.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.85M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.85
Change-$0.25 (-1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.12M
MSSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSCX has more cash in the bank: 79.8M vs. WCMLX (44.1M). MSSCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSCX (4.52) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSCX (28 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSCX (1.23). MSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSCX (100000) and WCMLX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.09 vs. MSSCX (3.53). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 15.20 vs. MSSCX (6.30).
| MSSCX | WCMLX | MSSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.79 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.339 | 9.642 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.8M | 44.1M | 181% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.53 | 6.09 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.28 | 40.30 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.30 | 15.20 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement