Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSCX vs WCMLX
MSSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSCX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth I
Price$9.23
Change+$0.12 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.77M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.58
Change+$0.21 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.98M
MSSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSCX has more cash in the bank: 84.8M vs. WCMLX (45M). MSSCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSCX (4.58) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSCX (28 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSCX (1.23). MSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSCX (100000) and WCMLX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSSCX (7.77) and WCMLX (7.61) have marching annual gain over last year. WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.08 vs. MSSCX (15.10).
| MSSCX | WCMLX | MSSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.79 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.125 | 6.610 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.8M | 45M | 188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.77 | 7.61 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 29.46 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.10 | 22.08 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.73 | N/A | - |