Ad is loading...
MSSCX vs WCMLX
MSSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSCX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth I
Price$7.13
Change-$0.60 (-7.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.52M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.81
Change-$0.86 (-7.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.58M
MSSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSCX has more cash in the bank: 81.5M vs. WCMLX (41.6M). MSSCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSCX (5.50) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSCX (28 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MSSCX (1.38). MSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). MSSCX (100000) and WCMLX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.95 vs. MSSCX (-15.24). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 62.99 vs. MSSCX (55.11).
| MSSCX | WCMLX | MSSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.99 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.86 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.959 | -9.253 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.5M | 41.6M | 196% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.24 | -9.95 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.69 | -6.42 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.11 | 62.99 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...