Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSCX vs WCMLX
MSSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSCX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth I
Price$9.01
Change+$0.06 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.27M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
MSSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSCX has more cash in the bank: 73.3M vs. WCMLX (41.3M). MSSCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSCX (4.37) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSCX (28 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSCX (1.23). MSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSCX (100000) and WCMLX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.04 vs. MSSCX (-7.12). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. MSSCX (-9.86).
| MSSCX | WCMLX | MSSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.79 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.936 | 1.788 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.3M | 41.3M | 177% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.12 | -3.04 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.55 | 21.43 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.86 | -0.83 | 1,184% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.73 | N/A | - |