Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs NRGSX
MSSVX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs NRGSX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$8.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.31M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.39
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.2B
MSSVX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.2B vs. MSSVX (73.3M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: MSSVX (4.57) vs NRGSX (0.07). MSSVX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: MSSVX (16 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). MSSVX (1.54) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSSVX: NRGSX (0) vs MSSVX (2000). MSSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.98 vs. NRGSX (-14.54). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -10.73 vs. MSSVX (-14.17).
| MSSVX | NRGSX | MSSVX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.74 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.74 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.519 | -7.544 | -20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.3M | 8.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.57 | 0.07 | 6,907% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.98 | -14.54 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.95 | -4.05 | -641% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.17 | -10.73 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.84 | 3.75 | -1,036% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers