Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMLX
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$8.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.31M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13M
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 73.3M vs. WCMLX (41.1M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSVX (4.57) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSSVX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.18 vs. MSSVX (-5.98). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.99 vs. MSSVX (-14.17).
| MSSVX | WCMLX | MSSVX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.99 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.79 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.519 | 1.400 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.3M | 41.1M | 178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.98 | -2.18 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.95 | 20.96 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.17 | -0.99 | 1,435% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.84 | N/A | - |