Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMLX
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$8.28
Change+$0.11 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.79M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.58
Change+$0.21 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.98M
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 83.8M vs. WCMLX (45M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSVX (4.78) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSSVX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). MSSVX (6.88) and WCMLX (6.59) have marching annual gain over last year. WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.93 vs. MSSVX (9.28).
| MSSVX | WCMLX | MSSVX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.99 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.79 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.810 | 5.599 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.8M | 45M | 186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.78 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 6.59 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.40 | 28.23 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.28 | 20.93 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement