Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMLX
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$8.60
Change+$0.09 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.51M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.89
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.16M
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 79.5M vs. WCMLX (44.2M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSVX (4.73) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSSVX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.91 vs. MSSVX (2.76). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 16.12 vs. MSSVX (0.42).
| MSSVX | WCMLX | MSSVX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.99 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.79 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.722 | 8.087 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.5M | 44.2M | 180% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.76 | 4.91 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.98 | 36.54 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.42 | 16.12 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement