Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMLX
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$7.90
Change-$0.04 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.55M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.78
Change-$0.07 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.34M
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 88.6M vs. WCMLX (43.3M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSVX (5.06) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSSVX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.62 vs. MSSVX (-3.90). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.09 vs. MSSVX (5.18).
| MSSVX | WCMLX | MSSVX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.99 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.79 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.506 | -0.078 | -651% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6M | 43.3M | 205% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.90 | -0.62 | 631% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.31 | 18.32 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.18 | 20.09 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement