Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMLX
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$7.98
Change+$0.30 (+3.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.74M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.29
Change+$0.51 (+3.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.82M
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 81.7M vs. WCMLX (42.8M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSVX (4.96) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). MSSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSSVX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.82 vs. MSSVX (0.88). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 13.40 vs. MSSVX (-0.14).
| MSSVX | WCMLX | MSSVX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.99 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.79 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.785 | -0.622 | 448% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.7M | 42.8M | 191% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.88 | 3.82 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.05 | 6.23 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.14 | 13.40 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement