Ad is loading...
MSSVX vs WCMLX
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMLX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$6.53
Change+$0.67 (+11.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.35M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.08
Change+$1.06 (+10.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.21M
MSSVX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 68.3M vs. WCMLX (36.2M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSSVX (5.73) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSSVX (15 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.71). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). MSSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSSVX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -23.04 vs. MSSVX (-29.57). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.47 vs. MSSVX (5.67).
| MSSVX | WCMLX | MSSVX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.99 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.86 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -25.823 | -22.084 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.3M | 36.2M | 189% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -29.57 | -23.04 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.26 | -15.01 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.67 | 17.47 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -60.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers