Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMNX
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMNX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$8.60
Change+$0.09 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.51M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.16M
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMNX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 79.5M vs. WCMNX (44.2M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: MSSVX (4.73) vs WCMNX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSSVX: WCMNX (1000) vs MSSVX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.66 vs. MSSVX (2.76). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 14.56 vs. MSSVX (0.42).
| MSSVX | WCMNX | MSSVX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.24 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 2.04 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.722 | 7.880 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.5M | 44.2M | 180% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.76 | 4.66 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.98 | 35.54 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.42 | 14.56 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement