Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMNX
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMNX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$8.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.31M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.89
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13M
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 73.3M vs. WCMNX (41.1M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: MSSVX (4.57) vs WCMNX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSSVX: WCMNX (1000) vs MSSVX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.36 vs. MSSVX (-5.98). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -2.21 vs. MSSVX (-14.17).
| MSSVX | WCMNX | MSSVX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.24 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 2.04 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.519 | 1.261 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.3M | 41.1M | 178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.98 | -2.36 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.95 | 20.09 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.17 | -2.21 | 642% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement