Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSSVX vs WCMNX
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMNX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$8.28
Change+$0.11 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.79M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.51
Change+$0.12 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.98M
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 83.8M vs. WCMNX (45M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: MSSVX (4.78) vs WCMNX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: MSSVX (16 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.54). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSSVX: WCMNX (1000) vs MSSVX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.31 vs. MSSVX (6.88). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 20.52 vs. MSSVX (9.28).
| MSSVX | WCMNX | MSSVX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.24 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 2.04 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.810 | 6.462 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.8M | 45M | 186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.78 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 7.31 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.40 | 28.54 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.28 | 20.52 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement