Ad is loading...
MSSVX vs WCMNX
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts MSSVX vs WCMNX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
Price$6.29
Change+$0.09 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.97M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$10.63
Change+$0.15 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.07M
MSSVX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSSVX vs. WCMNX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSSVX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSVX has more cash in the bank: 73M vs. WCMNX (39.1M). MSSVX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: MSSVX (5.73) vs WCMNX (0.00). MSSVX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: MSSVX (15 years) vs WCMNX (5 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than MSSVX (1.71). MSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 234.00 vs. WCMNX (48.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSSVX: WCMNX (1000) vs MSSVX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.97 vs. MSSVX (-23.07). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 24.77 vs. MSSVX (13.42).
| MSSVX | WCMNX | MSSVX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.24 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 2.11 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.380 | -16.233 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73M | 39.1M | 187% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.07 | -15.97 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.79 | -8.83 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.42 | 24.77 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | -57.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers