It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MSTH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWDCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MSTH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWDCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
MSTH (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWDCF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.09%.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
MSTH | SWDCF | MSTH / SWDCF | |
Capitalization | N/A | 680M | - |
EBITDA | N/A | 414M | - |
Gain YTD | -37.500 | -28.690 | 131% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 109.89 | - |
Revenue | N/A | 2.07B | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 198M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 1.85B | - |
MSTH | SWDCF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago13% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago37% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago28% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 7 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago27% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSTH has been loosely correlated with APNHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSTH jumps, then APNHF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MSTH | 100% | N/A | ||
APNHF - MSTH | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
SFOSF - MSTH | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GEDSF - MSTH | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HTSUY - MSTH | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FLGC - MSTH | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.92% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SWDCF and HHPHF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWDCF and HHPHF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SWDCF | 100% | N/A | ||
HHPHF - SWDCF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CVSI - SWDCF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.93% | ||
STEK - SWDCF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.80% | ||
MSTH - SWDCF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IXHL - SWDCF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
More |