MT
Price
$29.97
Change
-$0.71 (-2.31%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
22.95B
39 days until earnings call
PKX
Price
$47.41
Change
+$0.17 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
14.42B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MT vs PKX

Header iconMT vs PKX Comparison
Open Charts MT vs PKXBanner chart's image
ArcelorMittal
Price$29.97
Change-$0.71 (-2.31%)
Volume$1.37M
Capitalization22.95B
POSCO Holdings
Price$47.41
Change+$0.17 (+0.36%)
Volume$253.73K
Capitalization14.42B
MT vs PKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PKX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MT vs. PKX commentary
Jun 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MT is a Hold and PKX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MT: $29.97 vs. PKX: $47.41)
Brand notoriety: MT: Notable vs. PKX: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MT: 88% vs. PKX: 136%
Market capitalization -- MT: $22.95B vs. PKX: $14.42B
MT [@Steel] is valued at $22.95B. PKX’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $14.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $28.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePKX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PKX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PKX is a better buy in the long-term than MT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PKX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PKX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PKX is a better buy in the short-term than MT.

Price Growth

MT (@Steel) experienced а -0.53% price change this week, while PKX (@Steel) price change was -2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

MT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

PKX is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+0.71% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MT($22.9B) has a higher market cap than PKX($14.4B). PKX has higher P/E ratio than MT: PKX (23.92) vs MT (19.09). MT YTD gains are higher at: 30.731 vs. PKX (10.483). PKX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.17T vs. MT (5.88B). PKX has higher revenues than MT: PKX (72.84T) vs MT (61B).
MTPKXMT / PKX
Capitalization22.9B14.4B159%
EBITDA5.88B6.17T0%
Gain YTD30.73110.483293%
P/E Ratio19.0923.9280%
Revenue61B72.84T0%
Total Cash5.32BN/A-
Total Debt12BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MT vs PKX: Fundamental Ratings
MT
PKX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1827
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3281
SMR RATING
1..100
9819
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7828
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PKX's Valuation (7) in the Steel industry is in the same range as MT (13). This means that PKX’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PKX (81). This means that MT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PKX’s over the last 12 months.

PKX's SMR Rating (19) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for MT (98). This means that PKX’s stock grew significantly faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Steel industry is in the same range as PKX (57). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to PKX’s over the last 12 months.

PKX's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MT (78). This means that PKX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTPKX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PKX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UA6.590.73
+12.46%
Under Armour
INGN6.640.04
+0.61%
Inogen
DOGZ29.45-0.04
-0.14%
Dogness (International) Corp
CSL354.72-0.82
-0.23%
Carlisle Companies
CGC1.24-0.05
-3.88%
Canopy Growth Corp

PKX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PKX has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PKX jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PKX
1D Price
Change %
PKX100%
+0.36%
MLI - PKX
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
MT - PKX
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
SSAAY - PKX
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
TX - PKX
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
APEMY - PKX
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More