It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSSAAY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSAAY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
MT (@Steel) experienced а +3.63% price change this week, while SSAAY (@Steel) price change was -5.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.69%.
MT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
SSAAY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.
MT | SSAAY | MT / SSAAY | |
Capitalization | 25.9B | 6B | 431% |
EBITDA | 5.88B | 11.5B | 51% |
Gain YTD | 46.783 | 44.545 | 105% |
P/E Ratio | 21.43 | 12.47 | 172% |
Revenue | 61B | 98.9B | 62% |
Total Cash | 5.32B | 23.8B | 22% |
Total Debt | 12B | 9.66B | 124% |
MT | SSAAY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SSAAY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as MT (13) in the Steel industry. This means that SSAAY’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.
MT's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Steel industry is in the same range as SSAAY (36) in the null industry. This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to SSAAY’s over the last 12 months.
SSAAY's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as MT (98) in the Steel industry. This means that SSAAY’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.
SSAAY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MT (42) in the Steel industry. This means that SSAAY’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.
SSAAY's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MT (64) in the Steel industry. This means that SSAAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.
MT | SSAAY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 17 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago66% | 4 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago72% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
KEMX | 32.85 | 0.07 | +0.21% |
KraneShares MSCI Em Mkts ex CHN ETF | |||
TDV | 83.36 | 0.17 | +0.21% |
ProShares S&PTech Div Arstcrts ETF | |||
MUC | 10.08 | 0.02 | +0.20% |
Blackrock Muniholdings California Quality Fund | |||
SMAP | 24.85 | N/A | N/A |
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | |||
ROIS | 50.12 | N/A | N/A |
Hartford Multifactor International Small Company ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSAAY has been loosely correlated with PKX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSAAY jumps, then PKX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SSAAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SSAAY | 100% | -6.90% | ||
PKX - SSAAY | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
MT - SSAAY | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
TX - SSAAY | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
SID - SSAAY | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
OUTKY - SSAAY | 24% Poorly correlated | -6.40% | ||
More |