Ad is loading...
MTA
Price
$2.85
Change
-$0.22 (-7.17%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
130 days until earnings call
VIPRF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

MTA vs VIPRF

Header iconMTA vs VIPRF Comparison
Open Charts MTA vs VIPRFBanner chart's image
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
Price$2.85
Change-$0.22 (-7.17%)
Volume$587.58K
CapitalizationN/A
Silver Viper Minerals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$207.33K
CapitalizationN/A
MTA vs VIPRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTA vs. VIPRF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTA is a Sell and VIPRF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MTA: $2.85 vs. VIPRF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: MTA and VIPRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTA: 154% vs. VIPRF: 152%
Market capitalization -- MTA: $284.03M vs. VIPRF: $13.42M
MTA [@Precious Metals] is valued at $284.03M. VIPRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVIPRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VIPRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTA is a better buy in the long-term than VIPRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

MTA (@Precious Metals) experienced а -18.10% price change this week, while VIPRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -20.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTA is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTA($284M) has a higher market cap than VIPRF($13.4M). MTA YTD gains are higher at: -7.468 vs. VIPRF (-52.520). MTA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -917K vs. VIPRF (-2.54M). MTA has more cash in the bank: 14.1M vs. VIPRF (841K). MTA has higher revenues than VIPRF: MTA (4.6M) vs VIPRF (0).
MTAVIPRFMTA / VIPRF
Capitalization284M13.4M2,119%
EBITDA-917K-2.54M36%
Gain YTD-7.468-52.52014%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.6M0-
Total Cash14.1M841K1,677%
Total Debt14.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTA vs VIPRF: Fundamental Ratings
MTA
VIPRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8896
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6285
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VIPRF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (50). This means that VIPRF’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

VIPRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (100). This means that VIPRF’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as VIPRF (96). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to VIPRF’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as VIPRF (85). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to VIPRF’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VIPRF (100). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to VIPRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCC10.440.18
+1.77%
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Disc
BLDG26.07-0.01
-0.04%
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
INTL22.40-0.09
-0.40%
Main International ETF
IEV52.92-0.21
-0.40%
iShares Europe ETF
USOI63.79-1.14
-1.76%
Credit Suisse X-Lnks Crde OlShrsCvCllETN

MTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTA has been closely correlated with SVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTA jumps, then SVM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTA
1D Price
Change %
MTA100%
-7.17%
SVM - MTA
78%
Closely correlated
-2.01%
HL - MTA
70%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
PAAS - MTA
70%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
EQX - MTA
67%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
CDE - MTA
67%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
More

VIPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VIPRF and GATO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VIPRF and GATO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIPRF
1D Price
Change %
VIPRF100%
-15.76%
GATO - VIPRF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
MTA - VIPRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-7.17%
THXPF - VIPRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+10.26%
AG - VIPRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
HL - VIPRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
More