MTAGF
Price
$4.96
Change
+$2.26 (+83.70%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.46B
PAHGF
Price
$2.97
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.84B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTAGF vs PAHGF

Header iconMTAGF vs PAHGF Comparison
Open Charts MTAGF vs PAHGFBanner chart's image
Ceconomy AG
Price$4.96
Change+$2.26 (+83.70%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.46B
Pets at Home Group
Price$2.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization1.84B
MTAGF vs PAHGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTAGF vs. PAHGF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTAGF is a Hold and PAHGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MTAGF: $4.96 vs. PAHGF: $2.97)
Brand notoriety: MTAGF and PAHGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTAGF: 3% vs. PAHGF: 119%
Market capitalization -- MTAGF: $1.46B vs. PAHGF: $1.84B
MTAGF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $1.46B. PAHGF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTAGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAHGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAHGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTAGF is a better buy in the long-term than PAHGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTAGF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAHGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTAGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PAHGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTAGF is a better buy in the short-term than PAHGF.

Price Growth

MTAGF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PAHGF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +4.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.67% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAHGF($1.84B) has a higher market cap than MTAGF($1.46B). PAHGF has higher P/E ratio than MTAGF: PAHGF (18.55) vs MTAGF (11.22). MTAGF YTD gains are higher at: 59.496 vs. PAHGF (1.193). MTAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 932M vs. PAHGF (243M). MTAGF has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. PAHGF (178M). PAHGF has less debt than MTAGF: PAHGF (542M) vs MTAGF (2.67B). MTAGF has higher revenues than PAHGF: MTAGF (21.7B) vs PAHGF (1.4B).
MTAGFPAHGFMTAGF / PAHGF
Capitalization1.46B1.84B79%
EBITDA932M243M384%
Gain YTD59.4961.1934,989%
P/E Ratio11.2218.5560%
Revenue21.7B1.4B1,546%
Total Cash1.13B178M634%
Total Debt2.67B542M493%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTAGF vs PAHGF: Fundamental Ratings
MTAGF
PAHGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4692
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7498
SMR RATING
1..100
9378
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3383
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTAGF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as PAHGF (6). This means that MTAGF’s stock grew similarly to PAHGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as PAHGF (98). This means that MTAGF’s stock grew similarly to PAHGF’s over the last 12 months.

PAHGF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as MTAGF (93). This means that PAHGF’s stock grew similarly to MTAGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTAGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PAHGF (63). This means that MTAGF’s stock grew similarly to PAHGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTAGF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAHGF (83). This means that MTAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAHGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTAGFPAHGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSBCX20.920.10
+0.48%
Federated Hermes Global Allocation C
BCSFX27.880.10
+0.36%
Brown Capital Mgmt Intl Sm Co Instl
OAKIX30.110.04
+0.13%
Oakmark International Investor
MYIEX8.78N/A
N/A
MassMutual International Eq Svc
EIEAX37.58N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc I

MTAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTAGF and CDNTF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTAGF and CDNTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTAGF
1D Price
Change %
MTAGF100%
N/A
CDNTF - MTAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTTRY - MTAGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
PAHGF - MTAGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPTF - MTAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGFHY - MTAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
More

PAHGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PAHGF and MTTRY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PAHGF and MTTRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAHGF
1D Price
Change %
PAHGF100%
N/A
MTTRY - PAHGF
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
MTAGF - PAHGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGFHY - PAHGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
KGFHF - PAHGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.25%
MRGO - PAHGF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More