MTB
Price
$187.18
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Aug 11, 10:45 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.25B
66 days until earnings call
RVSB
Price
$4.91
Change
-$0.01 (-0.20%)
Updated
Aug 11, 10:53 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
103.2M
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTB vs RVSB

Header iconMTB vs RVSB Comparison
Open Charts MTB vs RVSBBanner chart's image
M&T Bank
Price$187.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$408
Capitalization29.25B
Riverview Ban
Price$4.91
Change-$0.01 (-0.20%)
Volume$100
Capitalization103.2M
MTB vs RVSB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTB vs. RVSB commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTB is a Buy and RVSB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (MTB: $187.17 vs. RVSB: $4.92)
Brand notoriety: MTB and RVSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTB: 71% vs. RVSB: 19%
Market capitalization -- MTB: $29.25B vs. RVSB: $103.2M
MTB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $29.25B. RVSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $103.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRVSB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MTB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RVSB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTB is a better buy in the long-term than RVSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RVSB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RVSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MTB and RVSB are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MTB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.18% price change this week, while RVSB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

RVSB is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.47% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTB($29.2B) has a higher market cap than RVSB($103M). RVSB has higher P/E ratio than MTB: RVSB (20.50) vs MTB (12.13). MTB YTD gains are higher at: 1.006 vs. RVSB (-13.379). MTB has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. RVSB (15M). RVSB has less debt than MTB: RVSB (106M) vs MTB (12B). MTB has higher revenues than RVSB: MTB (9.3B) vs RVSB (50.6M).
MTBRVSBMTB / RVSB
Capitalization29.2B103M28,350%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.006-13.379-8%
P/E Ratio12.1320.5059%
Revenue9.3B50.6M18,383%
Total Cash2.11B15M14,060%
Total Debt12B106M11,321%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTB vs RVSB: Fundamental Ratings
MTB
RVSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3083
SMR RATING
1..100
678
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5664
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RVSB's Valuation (74) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RVSB’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVSB (83) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVSB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for RVSB (78) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew significantly faster than RVSB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RVSB (64) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RVSB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVSB (95) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVSB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTBRVSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQLV25.520.23
+0.92%
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
RDVI24.920.18
+0.73%
FT Vest Ris Div Ach Trg Inc ETF
FAAR28.770.09
+0.31%
First Trust Alt Abs Ret Strat ETF
DIAL18.17-0.01
-0.05%
Columbia Diversified Fixed Inc Allc ETF
WFH65.65-1.80
-2.66%
Direxion Work From Home ETF

MTB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTB has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTB jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTB
1D Price
Change %
MTB100%
+1.87%
FNB - MTB
90%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
FITB - MTB
89%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
CFG - MTB
89%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
WBS - MTB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
HBAN - MTB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
More

RVSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RVSB has been loosely correlated with CWBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RVSB jumps, then CWBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVSB
1D Price
Change %
RVSB100%
+0.82%
CWBC - RVSB
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
GBCI - RVSB
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
SSB - RVSB
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
MTB - RVSB
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
UBFO - RVSB
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
More