CFG
Price
$64.61
Change
-$0.88 (-1.34%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
27.58B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTB
Price
$219.58
Change
-$3.84 (-1.72%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
32.78B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs MTB

CFG vs MTB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. MTB commentary
Sep 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Buy and MTB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs MTB: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
MTB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7970
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4230
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5348
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2517

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFG's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (51). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (42). This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (6). This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (50). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (53). This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGMTB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CFG: $65.49 vs. MTB: $223.42)
Brand notoriety: CFG and MTB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 143% vs. MTB: 93%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $27.58B vs. MTB: $32.78B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $27.58B. MTB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $32.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $172.4B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MTB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CFG and MTB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MTB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTB is a better buy in the short-term than CFG.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.76% price change this week, while MTB (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

MTB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.05% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SXC9.830.33
+3.47%
Suncoke Energy
JOYY81.051.51
+1.90%
JOYY Inc
CCI72.37-0.85
-1.16%
Crown Castle
CVR10.08-0.17
-1.61%
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co
DOUG1.56-0.04
-2.50%
Douglas Elliman

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with KEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then KEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
-2.78%
KEY - CFG
90%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
RF - CFG
89%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
FITB - CFG
88%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
ONB - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
FNB - CFG
86%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
More

MTB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTB has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTB jumps, then RF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTB
1D Price
Change %
MTB100%
-1.56%
RF - MTB
90%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
FITB - MTB
87%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
CFG - MTB
86%
Closely correlated
-2.78%
KEY - MTB
85%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
USB - MTB
85%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
More