MTB
Price
$183.24
Change
+$3.33 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jun 6, 10:54 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
24.23B
40 days until earnings call
TYFG
Price
$43.10
Change
-$0.05 (-0.12%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
113.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTB vs TYFG

Header iconMTB vs TYFG Comparison
Open Charts MTB vs TYFGBanner chart's image
M&T Bank
Price$183.24
Change+$3.33 (+1.85%)
Volume$2.33K
Capitalization24.23B
Tri County Financial Group
Price$43.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.12%)
Volume$285
Capitalization113.18M
MTB vs TYFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTB vs. TYFG commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTB is a StrongBuy and TYFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MTB: $179.91 vs. TYFG: $43.10)
Brand notoriety: MTB and TYFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTB: 70% vs. TYFG: 149%
Market capitalization -- MTB: $24.23B vs. TYFG: $113.18M
MTB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $24.23B. TYFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $113.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTYFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MTB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TYFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TYFG is a better buy in the long-term than MTB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MTB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MTB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while TYFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTB is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTB($24.2B) has a higher market cap than TYFG($113M). TYFG has higher P/E ratio than MTB: TYFG (9.78) vs MTB (9.07). MTB YTD gains are higher at: -2.912 vs. TYFG (-4.740). TYFG has less debt than MTB: TYFG (135M) vs MTB (13.2B). MTB has higher revenues than TYFG: MTB (9.4B) vs TYFG (59.7M).
MTBTYFGMTB / TYFG
Capitalization24.2B113M21,416%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.912-4.74061%
P/E Ratio9.079.7893%
Revenue9.4B59.7M15,742%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt13.2B135M9,778%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTB vs TYFG: Fundamental Ratings
MTB
TYFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6389
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3029
SMR RATING
1..100
420
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2556
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TYFG's Valuation (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTB (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TYFG’s stock grew significantly faster than MTB’s over the last 12 months.

TYFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as MTB (30) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TYFG’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's SMR Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TYFG (20) in the null industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to TYFG’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TYFG (55) in the null industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to TYFG’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TYFG (56) in the null industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to TYFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGB2.600.13
+5.26%
Taseko Mines Limited
OI13.250.21
+1.61%
O-I Glass
DOCU93.00-0.84
-0.90%
DocuSign
WORX0.50-0.01
-1.78%
SCWorx Corp
EP4.91-0.34
-6.48%
Empire Petroleum Corp

MTB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTB has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTB jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTB
1D Price
Change %
MTB100%
+0.02%
SNV - MTB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
FITB - MTB
89%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
PNC - MTB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
CFG - MTB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
PNFP - MTB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
More

TYFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TYFG and KPCPF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TYFG and KPCPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYFG
1D Price
Change %
TYFG100%
N/A
KPCPF - TYFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNC - TYFG
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
MTB - TYFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
HIFS - TYFG
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
USCB - TYFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
More