It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMOAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMOAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MTC (@Packaged Software) experienced а -15.81% price change this week, while TMOAF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.
MTC is expected to report earnings on Apr 13, 2023.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
MTC | TMOAF | MTC / TMOAF | |
Capitalization | 366M | 1.13B | 32% |
EBITDA | -6.96M | 31.5M | -22% |
Gain YTD | -78.010 | -10.000 | 780% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 879K | 573M | 0% |
Total Cash | 7.02M | 316M | 2% |
Total Debt | 1.09M | 50.2M | 2% |
MTC | TMOAF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 97 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTC's Valuation (26) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMOAF (67) in the null industry. This means that MTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMOAF’s over the last 12 months.
MTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TMOAF (100) in the null industry. This means that MTC’s stock grew similarly to TMOAF’s over the last 12 months.
MTC's SMR Rating (15) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for TMOAF (93) in the null industry. This means that MTC’s stock grew significantly faster than TMOAF’s over the last 12 months.
TMOAF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTC (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TMOAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTC’s over the last 12 months.
TMOAF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MTC (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TMOAF’s stock grew similarly to MTC’s over the last 12 months.
MTC | TMOAF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago37% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago48% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago41% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago42% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago42% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago87% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago33% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
RAGTX | 66.71 | N/A | N/A |
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology A | |||
AZMAX | 16.15 | N/A | N/A |
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value A | |||
JTKRX | 14.54 | -0.05 | -0.34% |
JHancock Global Thematic Opps R6 | |||
ITRIX | 29.41 | -0.13 | -0.44% |
VY® T. Rowe Price Capital Apprec I | |||
MSOIX | 39.91 | -0.25 | -0.62% |
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Class I |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMOAF has been loosely correlated with MTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMOAF jumps, then MTC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMOAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TMOAF | 100% | N/A | ||
MTC - TMOAF | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.24% | ||
SFSVF - TMOAF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
AIFS - TMOAF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
VASO - TMOAF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
TMSNY - TMOAF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.94% | ||
More |