MTLRF
Price
$1.57
Change
-$0.23 (-12.78%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.96M
NUVSF
Price
$10.47
Change
-$0.23 (-2.15%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.08B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTLRF vs NUVSF

Header iconMTLRF vs NUVSF Comparison
Open Charts MTLRF vs NUVSFBanner chart's image
Metalore Resources
Price$1.57
Change-$0.23 (-12.78%)
Volume$500
Capitalization2.96M
NuVista Energy
Price$10.47
Change-$0.23 (-2.15%)
Volume$40.67K
Capitalization2.08B
MTLRF vs NUVSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NUVSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTLRF vs. NUVSF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTLRF is a Hold and NUVSF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MTLRF: $1.57 vs. NUVSF: $10.47)
Brand notoriety: MTLRF and NUVSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTLRF: 100% vs. NUVSF: 1%
Market capitalization -- MTLRF: $2.96M vs. NUVSF: $2.08B
MTLRF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $2.96M. NUVSF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTLRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNUVSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTLRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NUVSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NUVSF is a better buy in the long-term than MTLRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NUVSF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NUVSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MTLRF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NUVSF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -1.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.70% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NUVSF($2.08B) has a higher market cap than MTLRF($2.96M). NUVSF YTD gains are higher at: 9.794 vs. MTLRF (0.000). NUVSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 778M vs. MTLRF (-724.76K). MTLRF has more cash in the bank: 5.09M vs. NUVSF (2.68M). NUVSF has higher revenues than MTLRF: NUVSF (1.22B) vs MTLRF (386K).
MTLRFNUVSFMTLRF / NUVSF
Capitalization2.96M2.08B0%
EBITDA-724.76K778M-0%
Gain YTD0.0009.794-
P/E RatioN/A8.45-
Revenue386K1.22B0%
Total Cash5.09M2.68M190%
Total DebtN/A386M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTLRF vs NUVSF: Fundamental Ratings
MTLRF
NUVSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10018
SMR RATING
1..100
9553
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6334
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTLRF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as NUVSF (62). This means that MTLRF’s stock grew similarly to NUVSF’s over the last 12 months.

NUVSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTLRF (100). This means that NUVSF’s stock grew significantly faster than MTLRF’s over the last 12 months.

NUVSF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTLRF (95). This means that NUVSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTLRF’s over the last 12 months.

NUVSF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLRF (75). This means that NUVSF’s stock grew similarly to MTLRF’s over the last 12 months.

NUVSF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLRF (63). This means that NUVSF’s stock grew similarly to MTLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTLRFNUVSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NUVSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSKN1.780.08
+4.71%
Strata Skin Sciences
ACLS80.611.82
+2.31%
Axcelis Technologies
FNF60.570.15
+0.25%
Fidelity National Financial
TWI8.790.02
+0.23%
Titan International
MPU1.77-0.11
-5.85%
Mega Matrix Inc

MTLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTLRF and IGESF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTLRF and IGESF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTLRF
1D Price
Change %
MTLRF100%
N/A
IGESF - MTLRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NUVSF - MTLRF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.15%
KELTF - MTLRF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
JRNGF - MTLRF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
MWCAF - MTLRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NUVSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NUVSF has been loosely correlated with PRMRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NUVSF jumps, then PRMRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NUVSF
1D Price
Change %
NUVSF100%
-2.15%
PRMRF - NUVSF
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.27%
CRLFF - NUVSF
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
MEGEF - NUVSF
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
TNEYF - NUVSF
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
BTE - NUVSF
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.54%
More