MTNOY
Price
$9.62
Change
+$0.28 (+3.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.92B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PCWLF
Price
$0.68
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.24B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTNOY vs PCWLF

Header iconMTNOY vs PCWLF Comparison
Open Charts MTNOY vs PCWLFBanner chart's image
MTN Group
Price$9.62
Change+$0.28 (+3.00%)
Volume$1.89K
Capitalization16.92B
PCCW
Price$0.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$560
Capitalization5.24B
MTNOY vs PCWLF Comparison Chart in %
MTNOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTNOY vs. PCWLF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTNOY is a Hold and PCWLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MTNOY: $9.62 vs. PCWLF: $0.68)
Brand notoriety: MTNOY and PCWLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTNOY: 6% vs. PCWLF: 31%
Market capitalization -- MTNOY: $16.92B vs. PCWLF: $5.24B
MTNOY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $16.92B. PCWLF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $5.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $258.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTNOY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePCWLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTNOY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PCWLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTNOY is a better buy in the long-term than PCWLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTNOY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCWLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTNOY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PCWLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCWLF is a better buy in the short-term than MTNOY.

Price Growth

MTNOY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +8.21% price change this week, while PCWLF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTNOY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.34% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTNOY($16.9B) has a higher market cap than PCWLF($5.24B). MTNOY YTD gains are higher at: 105.117 vs. PCWLF (15.247). MTNOY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 84.5B vs. PCWLF (5.8B). MTNOY has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. PCWLF (3.14B). PCWLF has less debt than MTNOY: PCWLF (59.3B) vs MTNOY (149B). MTNOY has higher revenues than PCWLF: MTNOY (206B) vs PCWLF (38.8B).
MTNOYPCWLFMTNOY / PCWLF
Capitalization16.9B5.24B323%
EBITDA84.5B5.8B1,458%
Gain YTD105.11715.247689%
P/E Ratio40.77N/A-
Revenue206B38.8B531%
Total Cash106B3.14B3,373%
Total Debt149B59.3B251%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTNOY vs PCWLF: Fundamental Ratings
MTNOY
PCWLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3165
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5378
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4287
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCWLF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTNOY (60). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTNOY’s over the last 12 months.

MTNOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as PCWLF (78). This means that MTNOY’s stock grew similarly to PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

MTNOY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PCWLF (100). This means that MTNOY’s stock grew similarly to PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

MTNOY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PCWLF (50). This means that MTNOY’s stock grew similarly to PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

MTNOY's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCWLF (87). This means that MTNOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTNOYPCWLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTNOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QWLD140.360.92
+0.66%
SPDR® MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
MDLV27.720.17
+0.62%
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
SPTM80.350.41
+0.51%
SPDR® Port S&P 1500 Comps Stk Mkt ETF
CORO30.56N/A
N/A
iShares International Country Rot ActETF
EWI50.77-0.11
-0.22%
iShares MSCI Italy ETF

MTNOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTNOY has been loosely correlated with VDMCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTNOY jumps, then VDMCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTNOY
1D Price
Change %
MTNOY100%
+3.05%
VDMCY - MTNOY
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.79%
TELNY - MTNOY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
TIGO - MTNOY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
KT - MTNOY
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
ATUS - MTNOY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
More

PCWLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCWLF and MTNOY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCWLF and MTNOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCWLF
1D Price
Change %
PCWLF100%
-0.02%
MTNOY - PCWLF
15%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
MYTAY - PCWLF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
NPPXF - PCWLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
PTITF - PCWLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTXKY - PCWLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-11.03%
More