MTPOF
Price
$1.13
Change
-$0.09 (-7.38%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.41B
SBGOF
Price
$12.77
Change
-$1.09 (-7.86%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
23.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTPOF vs SBGOF

Header iconMTPOF vs SBGOF Comparison
Open Charts MTPOF vs SBGOFBanner chart's image
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
Price$1.13
Change-$0.09 (-7.38%)
Volume$1.04K
Capitalization5.41B
Standard Bank Group
Price$12.77
Change-$1.09 (-7.86%)
Volume$321
Capitalization23.07B
MTPOF vs SBGOF Comparison Chart in %
MTPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTPOF vs. SBGOF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTPOF is a Hold and SBGOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MTPOF: $1.13 vs. SBGOF: $12.77)
Brand notoriety: MTPOF and SBGOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTPOF: 39% vs. SBGOF: 65%
Market capitalization -- MTPOF: $5.41B vs. SBGOF: $23.07B
MTPOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.41B. SBGOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $23.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTPOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBGOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MTPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBGOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBGOF is a better buy in the long-term than MTPOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTPOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBGOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTPOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBGOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTPOF is a better buy in the short-term than SBGOF.

Price Growth

MTPOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -11.76% price change this week, while SBGOF (@Regional Banks) price change was -11.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBGOF($23.1B) has a higher market cap than MTPOF($5.41B). SBGOF has higher P/E ratio than MTPOF: SBGOF (8.63) vs MTPOF (6.47). SBGOF YTD gains are higher at: 15.391 vs. MTPOF (-5.059). SBGOF has less debt than MTPOF: SBGOF (31.1B) vs MTPOF (105B). SBGOF has higher revenues than MTPOF: SBGOF (196B) vs MTPOF (151B).
MTPOFSBGOFMTPOF / SBGOF
Capitalization5.41B23.1B23%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.05915.391-33%
P/E Ratio6.478.6375%
Revenue151B196B77%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt105B31.1B338%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTPOF vs SBGOF: Fundamental Ratings
MTPOF
SBGOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6543
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8662
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4870
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5024

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBGOF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTPOF (54). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (65). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (1). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (86). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as SBGOF (70). This means that MTPOF’s stock grew similarly to SBGOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTPOFSBGOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VOO615.300.05
+0.01%
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
XUSP46.71N/A
+0.01%
Innovator Uncapped Accelerated US Eq ETF
LFBB168.56N/A
N/A
LifeX 2063 Longevity Income ETF
PSEP42.94-0.02
-0.05%
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF-Sep
TUSI25.36-0.05
-0.20%
Touchstone Ultra Short Income ETF

MTPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTPOF has been loosely correlated with SBGOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTPOF jumps, then SBGOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTPOF
1D Price
Change %
MTPOF100%
-7.70%
SBGOF - MTPOF
54%
Loosely correlated
-7.84%
CIHHF - MTPOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSNHF - MTPOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBNNF - MTPOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHKY - MTPOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More

SBGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBGOF has been loosely correlated with MTPOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBGOF jumps, then MTPOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBGOF
1D Price
Change %
SBGOF100%
-7.84%
MTPOF - SBGOF
54%
Loosely correlated
-7.70%
CIHHF - SBGOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBO - SBGOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNLC - SBGOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A