MTRAF
Price
$70.43
Change
+$0.34 (+0.49%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
15.16B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WNGRF
Price
$67.07
Change
+$1.57 (+2.40%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
25.83B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTRAF vs WNGRF

Header iconMTRAF vs WNGRF Comparison
Open Charts MTRAF vs WNGRFBanner chart's image
Metro
Price$70.43
Change+$0.34 (+0.49%)
Volume$732
Capitalization15.16B
Weston George Ltd. (Canada)
Price$67.07
Change+$1.57 (+2.40%)
Volume$13.35K
Capitalization25.83B
MTRAF vs WNGRF Comparison Chart in %
MTRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WNGRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTRAF vs. WNGRF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTRAF is a Hold and WNGRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (MTRAF: $70.43 vs. WNGRF: $67.07)
Brand notoriety: MTRAF and WNGRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTRAF: 81% vs. WNGRF: 56%
Market capitalization -- MTRAF: $15.16B vs. WNGRF: $25.83B
MTRAF [@Food Retail] is valued at $15.16B. WNGRF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $25.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $51.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTRAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWNGRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WNGRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WNGRF is a better buy in the long-term than MTRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTRAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WNGRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTRAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WNGRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MTRAF and WNGRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MTRAF (@Food Retail) experienced а +1.50% price change this week, while WNGRF (@Food Retail) price change was +7.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (-1.69% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WNGRF($25.8B) has a higher market cap than MTRAF($15.2B). WNGRF has higher P/E ratio than MTRAF: WNGRF (25.15) vs MTRAF (21.36). WNGRF YTD gains are higher at: 27.284 vs. MTRAF (12.257). WNGRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.23B vs. MTRAF (2.08B). WNGRF has more cash in the bank: 2.13B vs. MTRAF (75.6M). MTRAF has less debt than WNGRF: MTRAF (4.4B) vs WNGRF (22.7B). WNGRF has higher revenues than MTRAF: WNGRF (62.9B) vs MTRAF (21.8B).
MTRAFWNGRFMTRAF / WNGRF
Capitalization15.2B25.8B59%
EBITDA2.08B7.23B29%
Gain YTD12.25727.28445%
P/E Ratio21.3625.1585%
Revenue21.8B62.9B35%
Total Cash75.6M2.13B4%
Total Debt4.4B22.7B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTRAF vs WNGRF: Fundamental Ratings
MTRAF
WNGRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2838
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
267
SMR RATING
1..100
5445
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4091
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WNGRF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (87). This means that WNGRF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

WNGRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (26). This means that WNGRF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

WNGRF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (54). This means that WNGRF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

WNGRF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRAF (56). This means that WNGRF’s stock grew similarly to MTRAF’s over the last 12 months.

MTRAF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WNGRF (91). This means that MTRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WNGRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTRAFWNGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WNGRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GUG15.260.13
+0.86%
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
QQMG41.500.23
+0.55%
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
MVPL35.320.10
+0.29%
Miller Value Ptnrs Leverage ETF
VOX180.93-0.03
-0.02%
Vanguard Communication Services ETF
CERY29.32-0.34
-1.15%
SPDR Blmbrg Enh Roll Y Cmd Stgy NoK-1ETF

MTRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTRAF and EMLAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTRAF and EMLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTRAF
1D Price
Change %
MTRAF100%
+0.49%
EMLAF - MTRAF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNGRF - MTRAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGVC - MTRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
IMKTA - MTRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
LBLCF - MTRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
More

WNGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WNGRF and MTRAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WNGRF and MTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WNGRF
1D Price
Change %
WNGRF100%
N/A
MTRAF - WNGRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
LBLCF - WNGRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
KR - WNGRF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
GO - WNGRF
13%
Poorly correlated
-4.98%
NGVC - WNGRF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More