MTTRF
Price
$7.57
Change
+$0.12 (+1.61%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SLB
Price
$34.55
Change
+$0.23 (+0.67%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
79.1B
68 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MTTRF vs SLB

Header iconMTTRF vs SLB Comparison
Open Charts MTTRF vs SLBBanner chart's image
Mattr
Price$7.57
Change+$0.12 (+1.61%)
Volume$13.69K
CapitalizationN/A
Schlumberger
Price$34.55
Change+$0.23 (+0.67%)
Volume$7.41M
Capitalization79.1B
MTTRF vs SLB Comparison Chart
Loading...
SLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTTRF vs. SLB commentary
May 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTTRF is a Hold and SLB is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2025
Stock price -- (MTTRF: $7.57 vs. SLB: $34.55)
Brand notoriety: MTTRF: Not notable vs. SLB: Notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTTRF: 56% vs. SLB: 38%
Market capitalization -- MTTRF: $0 vs. SLB: $79.1B
MTTRF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $0. SLB’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $79.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTTRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MTTRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLB is a better buy in the long-term than MTTRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLB’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MTTRF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +6.54% price change this week, while SLB (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLB is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+0.58% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLB YTD gains are higher at: -9.258 vs. MTTRF (-13.486).
MTTRFSLBMTTRF / SLB
CapitalizationN/A79.1B-
EBITDAN/A7.54B-
Gain YTD-13.486-9.258146%
P/E RatioN/A18.98-
RevenueN/A33.1B-
Total CashN/A3.99B-
Total DebtN/A12B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTTRF vs SLB: Fundamental Ratings
MTTRF
SLB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
468
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5048
SMR RATING
1..100
8943
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2480
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLB's Valuation (57) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as MTTRF (69) in the null industry. This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to MTTRF’s over the last 12 months.

SLB's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as MTTRF (50) in the null industry. This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to MTTRF’s over the last 12 months.

SLB's SMR Rating (43) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTTRF (89) in the null industry. This means that SLB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTTRF’s over the last 12 months.

MTTRF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SLB (62) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that MTTRF’s stock grew similarly to SLB’s over the last 12 months.

MTTRF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLB (80) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that MTTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRFAX8.760.05
+0.57%
Cohen & Steers International Realty A
THPMX13.120.04
+0.31%
Thompson MidCap
FAMEX58.050.01
+0.02%
FAM Dividend Focus Fund Investor
PJGQX20.81-0.05
-0.24%
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth R6
JMVSX34.88-0.11
-0.31%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value I

MTTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTTRF and AROC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTTRF and AROC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTTRF
1D Price
Change %
MTTRF100%
+1.61%
AROC - MTTRF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
HAL - MTTRF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
TTI - MTTRF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
SLB - MTTRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
KGS - MTTRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
More

SLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLB has been closely correlated with CHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLB jumps, then CHX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLB
1D Price
Change %
SLB100%
+0.67%
CHX - SLB
99%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
HAL - SLB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
WFRD - SLB
80%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
BKR - SLB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
NOV - SLB
77%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
More