Ad is loading...
MTUM vs SCHG
MTUM vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts MTUM vs SCHG
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Price$210.79
Change-$1.18 (-0.56%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$27.61
Change-$0.16 (-0.58%)
Volume$2.73K
CapitalizationN/A
MTUM vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MTUM vs. SCHG commentary
Nov 14, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTUM is a Sell and SCHG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 35.8B vs. MTUM (13B). MTUM (35.659) and SCHG (35.176) have matching annual dividend yield . MTUM was incepted earlier than SCHG: MTUM (12 years) vs SCHG (15 years). MTUM has a higher turnover SCHG (9.00) vs SCHG (9.00).
| MTUM | SCHG | MTUM / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 35.659 | 35.176 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 13B | 35.8B | 36% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 111.00 | 9.00 | 1,233% |
| Yield | 0.78 | 0.43 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MTUM | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTUM has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTUM jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTUM | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| CDNS - MTUM | 81% Closely correlated | +2.92% | ||
| SNPS - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| KLAC - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| LRCX - MTUM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.44% | ||
| VRT - MTUM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +2.92% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| KLAC - SCHG | 73% Closely correlated | -3.04% | ||
More | ||||