MTYFF
Price
$27.02
Change
-$0.08 (-0.30%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
627.6M
PBPB
Price
$17.03
Change
-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
515.24M
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTYFF vs PBPB

Header iconMTYFF vs PBPB Comparison
Open Charts MTYFF vs PBPBBanner chart's image
MTY Food Group
Price$27.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.30%)
Volume$2.48K
Capitalization627.6M
Potbelly
Price$17.03
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Volume$586.79K
Capitalization515.24M
MTYFF vs PBPB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTYFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTYFF vs. PBPB commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTYFF is a Hold and PBPB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MTYFF: $27.02 vs. PBPB: $17.03)
Brand notoriety: MTYFF and PBPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTYFF: 15% vs. PBPB: 59%
Market capitalization -- MTYFF: $627.6M vs. PBPB: $515.24M
MTYFF [@Restaurants] is valued at $627.6M. PBPB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $515.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $215.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTYFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBPB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MTYFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PBPB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBPB is a better buy in the long-term than MTYFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTYFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBPB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTYFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PBPB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBPB is a better buy in the short-term than MTYFF.

Price Growth

MTYFF (@Restaurants) experienced а -3.07% price change this week, while PBPB (@Restaurants) price change was +0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

PBPB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.37% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTYFF($628M) has a higher market cap than PBPB($515M). PBPB has higher P/E ratio than MTYFF: PBPB (48.66) vs MTYFF (21.74). PBPB YTD gains are higher at: 80.786 vs. MTYFF (-17.747). MTYFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 181M vs. PBPB (25M). MTYFF has more cash in the bank: 47.2M vs. PBPB (16.2M). PBPB has less debt than MTYFF: PBPB (148M) vs MTYFF (1.17B). MTYFF has higher revenues than PBPB: MTYFF (1.17B) vs PBPB (469M).
MTYFFPBPBMTYFF / PBPB
Capitalization628M515M122%
EBITDA181M25M724%
Gain YTD-17.74780.786-22%
P/E Ratio21.7448.6645%
Revenue1.17B469M249%
Total Cash47.2M16.2M291%
Total Debt1.17B148M791%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTYFF vs PBPB: Fundamental Ratings
MTYFF
PBPB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7930
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9327
SMR RATING
1..100
8646
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTYFF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBPB (89) in the Restaurants industry. This means that MTYFF’s stock grew significantly faster than PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTYFF (93) in the null industry. This means that PBPB’s stock grew significantly faster than MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's SMR Rating (46) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTYFF (86) in the null industry. This means that PBPB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTYFF (77) in the null industry. This means that PBPB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MTYFF (9) in the null industry. This means that PBPB’s stock grew similarly to MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTYFFPBPB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTYFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEJCX6.88N/A
N/A
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap C
FAERX37.96N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Overseas M
SAREX11.45N/A
N/A
SA Real Estate Securities
FDSCX40.20N/A
N/A
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap
FUEPX63.73-0.52
-0.81%
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-2

MTYFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTYFF and WEN have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTYFF and WEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTYFF
1D Price
Change %
MTYFF100%
N/A
WEN - MTYFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
QSR - MTYFF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
RICK - MTYFF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
KRUS - MTYFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
PBPB - MTYFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More

PBPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBPB has been loosely correlated with RICK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBPB jumps, then RICK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBPB
1D Price
Change %
PBPB100%
-0.06%
RICK - PBPB
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.37%
PZZA - PBPB
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
LOCO - PBPB
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
TXRH - PBPB
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
BROS - PBPB
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
More