MTYFF
Price
$27.05
Change
-$2.25 (-7.68%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
632.74M
QSR
Price
$63.21
Change
-$0.37 (-0.58%)
Updated
Apr 7, 02:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
20.69B
31 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MTYFF vs QSR

Header iconMTYFF vs QSR Comparison
Open Charts MTYFF vs QSRBanner chart's image
MTY Food Group
Price$27.05
Change-$2.25 (-7.68%)
Volume$3.95K
Capitalization632.74M
Restaurant Brands International
Price$63.21
Change-$0.37 (-0.58%)
Volume$3.18K
Capitalization20.69B
MTYFF vs QSR Comparison Chart
Loading...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTYFF vs. QSR commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTYFF is a Hold and QSR is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MTYFF: $27.05 vs. QSR: $63.58)
Brand notoriety: MTYFF and QSR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTYFF: 58% vs. QSR: 199%
Market capitalization -- MTYFF: $632.74M vs. QSR: $20.69B
MTYFF [@Restaurants] is valued at $632.74M. QSR’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $20.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $214.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTYFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQSR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MTYFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QSR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, QSR is a better buy in the long-term than MTYFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QSR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • QSR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

MTYFF (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.13% price change this week, while QSR (@Restaurants) price change was -1.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -5.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

QSR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-5.02% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QSR($20.7B) has a higher market cap than MTYFF($633M). MTYFF has higher P/E ratio than QSR: MTYFF (38.08) vs QSR (19.99). QSR YTD gains are higher at: -1.557 vs. MTYFF (-17.662). QSR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.66B vs. MTYFF (250M). MTYFF has less debt than QSR: MTYFF (1.19B) vs QSR (16B). QSR has higher revenues than MTYFF: QSR (8.41B) vs MTYFF (1.16B).
MTYFFQSRMTYFF / QSR
Capitalization633M20.7B3%
EBITDA250M2.66B9%
Gain YTD-17.662-1.5571,135%
P/E Ratio38.0819.99190%
Revenue1.16B8.41B14%
Total Cash51MN/A-
Total Debt1.19B16B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTYFF vs QSR: Fundamental Ratings
MTYFF
QSR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
6129
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7871
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
338
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTYFF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as QSR (21) in the Restaurants industry. This means that MTYFF’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTYFF (100) in the null industry. This means that QSR’s stock grew significantly faster than MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's SMR Rating (29) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MTYFF (61) in the null industry. This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's Price Growth Rating (71) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MTYFF (78) in the null industry. This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

MTYFF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QSR (38) in the Restaurants industry. This means that MTYFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QSR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLUG1.220.01
+0.83%
Plug Power
GMGI1.92-0.04
-2.04%
Golden Matrix Group
BFST21.83-0.69
-3.06%
Business First Bancshares
COTY5.04-0.17
-3.26%
COTY
XXII1.05-0.11
-9.48%
22nd Century Group Inc

MTYFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTYFF and WEN have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTYFF and WEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTYFF
1D Price
Change %
MTYFF100%
-7.69%
WEN - MTYFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.47%
QSR - MTYFF
27%
Poorly correlated
-6.25%
RICK - MTYFF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.52%
KRUS - MTYFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.03%
PBPB - MTYFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.27%
More

QSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QSR has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QSR jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSR
1D Price
Change %
QSR100%
-6.25%
YUM - QSR
54%
Loosely correlated
-8.44%
MCD - QSR
51%
Loosely correlated
-5.71%
FRSH - QSR
44%
Loosely correlated
-6.18%
TXRH - QSR
44%
Loosely correlated
-4.30%
DPZ - QSR
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.22%
More