MTZ vs TFPN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTZ is a Hold and TFPN is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +1.13% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +2.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+2.88% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MTZ | TFPN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 16 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 85% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FEQTX | 27.27 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Equity Dividend Income | |||
| HLRRX | 9.58 | N/A | N/A |
| LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Instl | |||
| NWKDX | 77.16 | N/A | N/A |
| Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Gr Instl Svc | |||
| HLMVX | 32.46 | N/A | N/A |
| Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst | |||
| RWIIX | 12.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical Intl I | |||
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then EME could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| EME - MTZ | 83% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 81% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 81% Closely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| PRIM - MTZ | 80% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| IESC - MTZ | 74% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
More | ||||
TFPN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFPN has been loosely correlated with GTLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TFPN jumps, then GTLS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TFPN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TFPN | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| GTLS - TFPN | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| KEYS - TFPN | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| CR - TFPN | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| MTZ - TFPN | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| BDC - TFPN | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||