MU
Price
$185.69
Change
-$5.27 (-2.76%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
208.43B
70 days until earnings call
NVDA
Price
$185.04
Change
-$0.50 (-0.27%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
4.51T
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MU vs NVDA

Header iconMU vs NVDA Comparison
Open Charts MU vs NVDABanner chart's image
Micron Technology
Price$185.69
Change-$5.27 (-2.76%)
Volume$27.83M
Capitalization208.43B
NVIDIA
Price$185.04
Change-$0.50 (-0.27%)
Volume$140.09M
Capitalization4.51T
MU vs NVDA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MU vs. NVDA commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MU is a StrongBuy and NVDA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MU: $185.69 vs. NVDA: $185.04)
Brand notoriety: MU and NVDA are both notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MU: 117% vs. NVDA: 80%
Market capitalization -- MU: $208.43B vs. NVDA: $4.51T
MU [@Semiconductors] is valued at $208.43B. NVDA’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $4.51T. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.51T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $100.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNVDA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NVDA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the long-term than NVDA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVDA’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NVDA’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NVDA is a better buy in the short-term than MU.

Price Growth

MU (@Semiconductors) experienced а +11.05% price change this week, while NVDA (@Semiconductors) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +4.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +36.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +85.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

MU is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

NVDA is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+4.74% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NVDA($4.51T) has a higher market cap than MU($208B). NVDA has higher P/E ratio than MU: NVDA (52.72) vs MU (24.47). MU YTD gains are higher at: 121.273 vs. NVDA (37.821). NVDA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 103B vs. MU (18.5B). NVDA has less debt than MU: NVDA (10.6B) vs MU (16.1B). NVDA has higher revenues than MU: NVDA (165B) vs MU (37.4B).
MUNVDAMU / NVDA
Capitalization208B4.51T5%
EBITDA18.5B103B18%
Gain YTD121.27337.821321%
P/E Ratio24.4752.7246%
Revenue37.4B165B23%
Total Cash8.33BN/A-
Total Debt16.1B10.6B152%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU vs NVDA: Fundamental Ratings
MU
NVDA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2621
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
299
SMR RATING
1..100
4713
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10070
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MU's Valuation (34) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVDA (88). This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVDA’s over the last 12 months.

NVDA's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (29). This means that NVDA’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

NVDA's SMR Rating (13) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MU (47). This means that NVDA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MU’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as NVDA (8). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to NVDA’s over the last 12 months.

NVDA's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (100). This means that NVDA’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUNVDA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVDA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EUO28.460.29
+1.03%
ProShares UltraShort Euro
JAAA50.620.03
+0.06%
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
PGF14.72-0.01
-0.07%
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
GMMA21.25-0.03
-0.14%
GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF
FDEV33.02-0.18
-0.54%
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF

MU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MU
1D Price
Change %
MU100%
-2.76%
LRCX - MU
80%
Closely correlated
-5.90%
KLAC - MU
72%
Closely correlated
-4.82%
AMAT - MU
71%
Closely correlated
-5.52%
KLIC - MU
71%
Closely correlated
-3.75%
VECO - MU
70%
Closely correlated
-4.08%
More