MU
Price
$123.60
Change
+$1.78 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
138.13B
2 days until earnings call
ON
Price
$52.82
Change
+$0.56 (+1.07%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
22.07B
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MU vs ON

Header iconMU vs ON Comparison
Open Charts MU vs ONBanner chart's image
Micron Technology
Price$123.60
Change+$1.78 (+1.46%)
Volume$29.29M
Capitalization138.13B
ON Semiconductor
Price$52.82
Change+$0.56 (+1.07%)
Volume$12.89M
Capitalization22.07B
MU vs ON Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MU vs. ON commentary
Jun 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MU is a Hold and ON is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MU: $123.57 vs. ON: $52.82)
Brand notoriety: MU and ON are both notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MU: 152% vs. ON: 128%
Market capitalization -- MU: $138.13B vs. ON: $22.07B
MU [@Semiconductors] is valued at $138.13B. ON’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $22.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $3.51T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $55.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileON’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ON’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MU and ON are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ON’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the short-term than ON.

Price Growth

MU (@Semiconductors) experienced а +6.89% price change this week, while ON (@Semiconductors) price change was +3.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

MU is expected to report earnings on Sep 25, 2025.

ON is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+2.03% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MU($138B) has a higher market cap than ON($22.1B). ON has higher P/E ratio than MU: ON (36.68) vs MU (29.57). MU YTD gains are higher at: 47.054 vs. ON (-16.225). MU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.7B vs. ON (1.46B). MU has more cash in the bank: 8.22B vs. ON (3.01B). ON has less debt than MU: ON (3.37B) vs MU (15B). MU has higher revenues than ON: MU (31.3B) vs ON (6.67B).
MUONMU / ON
Capitalization138B22.1B624%
EBITDA14.7B1.46B1,008%
Gain YTD47.054-16.225-290%
P/E Ratio29.5736.6881%
Revenue31.3B6.67B470%
Total Cash8.22B3.01B273%
Total Debt15B3.37B445%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU vs ON: Fundamental Ratings
MU
ON
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4462
SMR RATING
1..100
6977
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1005
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MU's Valuation (51) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ON (68). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to ON’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ON (62). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to ON’s over the last 12 months.

MU's SMR Rating (69) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ON (77). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to ON’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ON (46). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to ON’s over the last 12 months.

ON's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for MU (100). This means that ON’s stock grew significantly faster than MU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUON
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BVS6.550.12
+1.87%
Bioventus
CME273.991.89
+0.69%
CME Group
MLSS0.88N/A
-0.07%
Milestone Scientific
NEXT8.44-0.02
-0.24%
NextDecade Corp
BXSL31.23-0.28
-0.89%
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund

MU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MU
1D Price
Change %
MU100%
+1.46%
LRCX - MU
80%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
RMBS - MU
73%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
KLAC - MU
72%
Closely correlated
-2.43%
AMAT - MU
71%
Closely correlated
-1.96%
ENTG - MU
71%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
More