MU
Price
$123.25
Change
-$1.51 (-1.21%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
137.93B
86 days until earnings call
RBCN
Price
$2.10
Change
-$0.20 (-8.70%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
3.47M
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MU vs RBCN

Header iconMU vs RBCN Comparison
Open Charts MU vs RBCNBanner chart's image
Micron Technology
Price$123.25
Change-$1.51 (-1.21%)
Volume$22.8M
Capitalization137.93B
Rubicon Technology
Price$2.10
Change-$0.20 (-8.70%)
Volume$528
Capitalization3.47M
MU vs RBCN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MU vs. RBCN commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MU is a StrongBuy and RBCN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (MU: $123.25 vs. RBCN: $2.30)
Brand notoriety: MU: Notable vs. RBCN: Not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MU: 109% vs. RBCN: 13%
Market capitalization -- MU: $137.93B vs. RBCN: $3.47M
MU [@Semiconductors] is valued at $137.93B. RBCN’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $3.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $3.85T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $59.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRBCN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RBCN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MU and RBCN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MU (@Semiconductors) experienced а +0.96% price change this week, while RBCN (@Semiconductors) price change was +5.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

MU is expected to report earnings on Sep 25, 2025.

RBCN is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+5.49% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MU($138B) has a higher market cap than RBCN($3.47M). MU (22.21) and RBCN (21.14) have similar P/E ratio . MU YTD gains are higher at: 46.638 vs. RBCN (27.273). MU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.7B vs. RBCN (387K). MU has more cash in the bank: 8.22B vs. RBCN (1.12M). RBCN has less debt than MU: RBCN (1.58M) vs MU (15B). MU has higher revenues than RBCN: MU (31.3B) vs RBCN (3.31M).
MURBCNMU / RBCN
Capitalization138B3.47M3,975,799%
EBITDA14.7B387K3,798,450%
Gain YTD46.63827.273171%
P/E Ratio22.2121.14105%
Revenue31.3B3.31M947,050%
Total Cash8.22B1.12M734,138%
Total Debt15B1.58M946,970%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU vs RBCN: Fundamental Ratings
MU
RBCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4530
SMR RATING
1..100
6995
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1004
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MU's Valuation (45) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBCN (88) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBCN’s over the last 12 months.

RBCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as MU (45) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that RBCN’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

MU's SMR Rating (69) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RBCN (95) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to RBCN’s over the last 12 months.

RBCN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as MU (38) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that RBCN’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

RBCN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for MU (100) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that RBCN’s stock grew significantly faster than MU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYMC3.130.04
+1.29%
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp
MTG27.840.17
+0.61%
MGIC Investment Corp
ANIP65.25-0.25
-0.38%
ANI Pharmaceuticals
DELL122.60-1.39
-1.12%
Dell Technologies
HUMA2.09-0.03
-1.42%
Humacyte

MU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MU
1D Price
Change %
MU100%
-1.21%
LRCX - MU
79%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
RMBS - MU
73%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
KLAC - MU
72%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
ENTG - MU
71%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
AMAT - MU
71%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
More

RBCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBCN and MU have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBCN and MU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBCN
1D Price
Change %
RBCN100%
-8.70%
MU - RBCN
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
SQNS - RBCN
14%
Poorly correlated
+14.83%
SIMO - RBCN
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
DIOD - RBCN
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
MCHP - RBCN
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
More