MUEL vs RYBIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUEL is a Buy and RYBIF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MUEL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRYBIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MUEL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RYBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
MUEL (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RYBIF (@Metal Fabrication) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -5.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.95%.
Reported Earning Dates
MUEL is expected to report earnings on Oct 25, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Metal Fabrication (-5.60% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| MUEL | RYBIF | MUEL / RYBIF | |
| Capitalization | 177M | 399M | 44% |
| EBITDA | 19M | 34.6B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 228.048 | -29.920 | -762% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 7.81 | - |
| Revenue | 241M | 297B | 0% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 31.3B | - |
| Total Debt | 8.16M | 65.9B | 0% |
MUEL | RYBIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 28 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RYBIF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUEL (41). This means that RYBIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUEL’s over the last 12 months.
MUEL's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RYBIF (100). This means that MUEL’s stock grew significantly faster than RYBIF’s over the last 12 months.
RYBIF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUEL (99). This means that RYBIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUEL’s over the last 12 months.
MUEL's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RYBIF (76). This means that MUEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RYBIF’s over the last 12 months.
RYBIF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as MUEL (90). This means that RYBIF’s stock grew similarly to MUEL’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
MUEL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MUEL and LQMT have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MUEL and LQMT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MUEL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUEL | 100% | N/A | ||
| LQMT - MUEL | 5% Poorly correlated | +6.08% | ||
| BEKSF - MUEL | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IAALF - MUEL | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.76% | ||
| TPCS - MUEL | 2% Poorly correlated | -9.59% | ||
| TYEKF - MUEL | -2% Poorly correlated | -2.94% | ||
More | ||||
RYBIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RYBIF and TKAMY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RYBIF and TKAMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RYBIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYBIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TKAMY - RYBIF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| OLNCF - RYBIF | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.26% | ||
| BEKSF - RYBIF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IAALF - RYBIF | -1% Poorly correlated | -4.76% | ||
| MUEL - RYBIF | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||