Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MVCAX vs NBRAX
MVCAX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs NBRAX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$24.90
Change-$0.44 (-1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.18M
MVCAX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. NBRAX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Buy and NBRAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. NBRAX (50.2M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than NBRAX: MVCAX (0.89) vs NBRAX (0.40). MVCAX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: MVCAX (24 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). NBRAX (1.78) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). NBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX (6%) and NBRAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.70 vs. MVCAX (-4.53). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. MVCAX (51.98).
| MVCAX | NBRAX | MVCAX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.21 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.78 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.086 | -3.614 | 58% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.8B | 50.2M | 33,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.40 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.53 | -3.70 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.00 | 12.47 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.98 | 66.66 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.51 | 8.42 | 635% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers