Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MVCAX vs NBRAX
MVCAX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs NBRAX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$26.92
Change+$0.16 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.77M
MVCAX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. NBRAX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Buy and NBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.2B vs. NBRAX (51.8M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than NBRAX: MVCAX (0.87) vs NBRAX (0.38). MVCAX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: MVCAX (24 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). NBRAX (1.78) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). NBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX (6%) and NBRAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.08 vs. MVCAX (-1.70). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 76.00 vs. MVCAX (54.59).
| MVCAX | NBRAX | MVCAX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.21 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.78 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.814 | 1.788 | 213% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.2B | 51.8M | 33,205% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.38 | 227% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.70 | -0.08 | 2,010% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.54 | 15.81 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.59 | 76.00 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.90 | 20.19 | 336% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement