Ad is loading...
MVCAX vs NBRAX
MVCAX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs NBRAX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$24.37
Change+$0.44 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.1M
MVCAX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. NBRAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Buy and NBRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. NBRAX (48.1M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than NBRAX: MVCAX (0.93) vs NBRAX (0.42). MVCAX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: MVCAX (24 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). NBRAX (1.78) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). NBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX (6%) and NBRAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX (1000) and NBRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.27 vs. NBRAX (-9.40). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 70.47 vs. MVCAX (56.76).
| MVCAX | NBRAX | MVCAX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.21 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.78 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.150 | -8.977 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.3B | 48.1M | 33,888% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.42 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.27 | -9.40 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.61 | 1.90 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.76 | 70.47 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.35 | 2.39 | 2,067% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers