Ad is loading...
MVCAX vs NMVZX
MVCAX vs NMVZX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs NMVZX
Nuance Mid Cap Value Z
Price$11.49
Change+$0.10 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets530.14M
MVCAX vs NMVZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. NMVZX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Buy and NMVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. NMVZX (530M). NMVZX pays higher dividends than MVCAX: NMVZX (3.87) vs MVCAX (0.93). MVCAX was incepted earlier than NMVZX: MVCAX (24 years) vs NMVZX (8 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than NMVZX (0.84). NMVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMVZX: MVCAX (1000) vs NMVZX (2500). NMVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.33 vs. MVCAX (-8.27). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.76 vs. NMVZX (5.69).
| MVCAX | NMVZX | MVCAX / NMVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.79 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.84 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.150 | -6.233 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.3B | 530M | 3,075% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 3.87 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.27 | -7.33 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.61 | -9.47 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.76 | 5.69 | 997% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...