Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MVCAX vs PQNAX
MVCAX vs PQNAX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs PQNAX
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value A
Price$26.53
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets570.18M
MVCAX vs PQNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. PQNAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Hold and PQNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. PQNAX (570M). PQNAX pays higher dividends than MVCAX: PQNAX (1.72) vs MVCAX (0.84). MVCAX was incepted earlier than PQNAX: MVCAX (24 years) vs PQNAX (35 years). PQNAX (1.12) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). PQNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX (6%) and PQNAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PQNAX: MVCAX (1000) vs PQNAX (2500). PQNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.88 vs. MVCAX (-5.08). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.25 vs. PQNAX (2.98).
| MVCAX | PQNAX | MVCAX / PQNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.00 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.12 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.531 | 4.604 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1B | 570M | 3,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.72 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.08 | 1.88 | -270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.52 | -5.09 | -344% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.25 | 2.98 | 1,684% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.90 | 19.10 | 397% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement