Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MVCAX vs SMVZX
MVCAX vs SMVZX Comparison
Open Charts MVCAX vs SMVZX
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$12.35
Change+$0.14 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
MVCAX vs SMVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MVCAX vs. SMVZX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MVCAX is a Buy and SMVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. SMVZX (1.56B). SMVZX pays higher dividends than MVCAX: SMVZX (1.17) vs MVCAX (0.87). MVCAX was incepted earlier than SMVZX: MVCAX (24 years) vs SMVZX (11 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than SMVZX (0.88). SMVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMVZX: MVCAX (1000) vs SMVZX (2500000). SMVZX (-5.33) and MVCAX (-5.36) have marching annual gain over last year. MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.43 vs. SMVZX (23.33).
| MVCAX | SMVZX | MVCAX / SMVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.79 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.88 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.076 | 1.160 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 1.56B | 1,081% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.17 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.36 | -5.33 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.95 | 23.93 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.43 | 23.33 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.16 | 1.14 | 5,347% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement