Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MWCPX vs PFNUX
MWCPX vs PFNUX Comparison
Open Charts MWCPX vs PFNUX
TCW MetWest Unconstrained Bd Plan
Price$10.51
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.75B
PIMCO Dynamic Bond I-3
Price$10.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.55B
MWCPX vs PFNUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MWCPX vs. PFNUX commentary
Oct 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MWCPX is a Hold and PFNUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MWCPX has more cash in the bank: 2.75B vs. PFNUX (2.55B). MWCPX pays higher dividends than PFNUX: MWCPX (6.02) vs PFNUX (4.76). MWCPX was incepted earlier than PFNUX: MWCPX (6 years) vs PFNUX (8 years). PFNUX (1.04) is less costly to investors than MWCPX (0.69). PFNUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 919.00 vs. MWCPX (188.00). PFNUX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWCPX: PFNUX (1000000) vs MWCPX (25000000). PFNUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. MWCPX (8.06). PFNUX return over 5 years is better than : 17.35 vs. MWCPX (14.56).
| MWCPX | PFNUX | MWCPX / PFNUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.94 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.04 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.075 | 7.666 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000000 | 1000000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.75B | 2.55B | 108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.02 | 4.76 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.06 | 9.20 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.28 | 25.65 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.56 | 17.35 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers