MWG
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 1, 04:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.61M
PRLPF
Price
$21.14
Change
-$0.82 (-3.73%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
821.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MWG vs PRLPF

Header iconMWG vs PRLPF Comparison
Open Charts MWG vs PRLPFBanner chart's image
Multi Ways Holdings
Price$0.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization12.61M
PROPEL
Price$21.14
Change-$0.82 (-3.73%)
Volume$4.35K
Capitalization821.89M
MWG vs PRLPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MWG vs. PRLPF commentary
Oct 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MWG is a Hold and PRLPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2025
Stock price -- (MWG: $0.30 vs. PRLPF: $21.14)
Brand notoriety: MWG and PRLPF are both not notable
MWG represents the Finance/Rental/Leasing, while PRLPF is part of the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MWG: 25% vs. PRLPF: 110%
Market capitalization -- MWG: $12.7M vs. PRLPF: $818.99M
MWG [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $12.7M. PRLPF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $818.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $61.96B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $675.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.61B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MWG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRLPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MWG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRLPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRLPF is a better buy in the long-term than MWG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MWG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRLPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MWG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PRLPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRLPF is a better buy in the short-term than MWG.

Price Growth

MWG (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -2.01% price change this week, while PRLPF (@Savings Banks) price change was -8.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.05%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.33% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

@Savings Banks (-2.13% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRLPF($822M) has a higher market cap than MWG($12.6M). PRLPF has higher P/E ratio than MWG: PRLPF (14.28) vs MWG (1.28). MWG YTD gains are higher at: 4.933 vs. PRLPF (-12.825).
MWGPRLPFMWG / PRLPF
Capitalization12.6M822M2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.933-12.825-38%
P/E Ratio1.2814.289%
RevenueN/A494M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A290M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MWGPRLPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNDAX26.83N/A
N/A
MFS New Discovery A
PWTAX54.09N/A
N/A
UBS US Allocation A
WBCCX10.87N/A
N/A
TETON Westwood Balanced C
NPNAX51.05N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value A
ACMTX10.86N/A
N/A
AB All Market Real Return C

MWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MWG and WSC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MWG and WSC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MWG
1D Price
Change %
MWG100%
+2.51%
WSC - MWG
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
CACC - MWG
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.83%
SNTG - MWG
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
SEZL - MWG
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
OPFI - MWG
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.87%
More

PRLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRLPF and ECPG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRLPF and ECPG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRLPF
1D Price
Change %
PRLPF100%
-3.72%
ECPG - PRLPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.29%
SEZL - PRLPF
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
VSTS - PRLPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
DWAY - PRLPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MWG - PRLPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
More