Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MWOBX vs RNPFX
MWOBX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts MWOBX vs RNPFX
MFS Global Growth B
Price$50.92
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets932.23M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$73.64
Change+$0.11 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
MWOBX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MWOBX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MWOBX is a StrongBuy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. MWOBX (932M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOBX: RNPFX (0.72) vs MWOBX (0.00). MWOBX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: MWOBX (32 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). MWOBX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX (24.00) and MWOBX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOBX: RNPFX (250) vs MWOBX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.45 vs. MWOBX (-2.54). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.29 vs. MWOBX (14.18).
| MWOBX | RNPFX | MWOBX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.46 | 428% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.46 | 450% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.940 | 18.698 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 932M | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.54 | 15.45 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.29 | 52.96 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.18 | 40.29 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.14 | 105.01 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement