Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MWOBX vs RNPFX
MWOBX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts MWOBX vs RNPFX
MFS Global Growth B
Price$51.63
Change-$0.20 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets936.73M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.27
Change-$0.49 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.38B
MWOBX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MWOBX vs. RNPFX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MWOBX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. MWOBX (937M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOBX: RNPFX (0.70) vs MWOBX (0.00). MWOBX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: MWOBX (32 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). MWOBX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX (24.00) and MWOBX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOBX: RNPFX (250) vs MWOBX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.50 vs. MWOBX (-2.76). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.58 vs. MWOBX (13.02).
| MWOBX | RNPFX | MWOBX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.46 | 428% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.46 | 450% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.690 | 19.713 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 937M | 164B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.76 | 13.50 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.48 | 62.58 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.02 | 37.58 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.43 | 96.83 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement