Ad is loading...
MXCCX vs VITSX
MXCCX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts MXCCX vs VITSX
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index C
Price$6.54
Change+$0.13 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets210.68M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$130.95
Change+$2.66 (+2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
MXCCX vs VITSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXCCX vs. VITSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCCX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. MXCCX (211M). VITSX pays higher dividends than MXCCX: VITSX (1.36) vs MXCCX (0.10). MXCCX was incepted earlier than VITSX: MXCCX (27 years) vs VITSX (28 years). MXCCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). MXCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). MXCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: MXCCX (1500) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.27 vs. MXCCX (-5.77). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 86.78 vs. MXCCX (-18.86).
| MXCCX | VITSX | MXCCX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.03 | 4,833% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.03 | 5,233% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.689 | -9.018 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 1.36 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.77 | 5.27 | -109% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.65 | 22.59 | -100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.86 | 86.78 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -59.31 | 150.66 | -39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...