Ad is loading...
MXCCX vs VTSAX
MXCCX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts MXCCX vs VTSAX
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index C
Price$6.54
Change+$0.13 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets210.68M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$130.93
Change+$2.66 (+2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
MXCCX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXCCX vs. VTSAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCCX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. MXCCX (211M). VTSAX pays higher dividends than MXCCX: VTSAX (1.35) vs MXCCX (0.10). MXCCX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: MXCCX (27 years) vs VTSAX (24 years). MXCCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). MXCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). MXCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: MXCCX (1500) vs VTSAX (3000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.27 vs. MXCCX (-5.77). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 86.80 vs. MXCCX (-18.86).
| MXCCX | VTSAX | MXCCX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.04 | 3,625% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.04 | 3,925% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.689 | -9.019 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 1.35 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.77 | 5.27 | -109% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.65 | 22.59 | -100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.86 | 86.80 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -59.31 | 150.71 | -39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...