Ad is loading...
MXCCX vs VTSMX
MXCCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts MXCCX vs VTSMX
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index C
Price$6.54
Change+$0.13 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets210.68M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$130.91
Change+$2.67 (+2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
MXCCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXCCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. MXCCX (211M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than MXCCX: VTSMX (1.25) vs MXCCX (0.10). MXCCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: MXCCX (27 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). MXCCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). MXCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). MXCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: MXCCX (1500) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.27 vs. MXCCX (-5.77). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 86.77 vs. MXCCX (-18.86).
| MXCCX | VTSMX | MXCCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.14 | 1,036% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.14 | 1,121% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.689 | -9.023 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 1.25 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.77 | 5.27 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.65 | 22.56 | -100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.86 | 86.77 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -59.31 | 150.14 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...