Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MXCCX vs VTSMX
MXCCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts MXCCX vs VTSMX
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index C
Price$7.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.61M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$152.62
Change+$0.67 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
MXCCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXCCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. MXCCX (245M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than MXCCX: VTSMX (1.12) vs MXCCX (0.10). MXCCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: MXCCX (28 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). MXCCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). MXCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). MXCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: MXCCX (1500) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.23 vs. MXCCX (4.66). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 92.66 vs. MXCCX (-15.45).
| MXCCX | VTSMX | MXCCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.14 | 1,036% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.14 | 1,121% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.977 | 7.812 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 245M | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 1.12 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.66 | 17.23 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.33 | 59.89 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.45 | 92.66 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -51.62 | 199.64 | -26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers