Advertisement
MXCHF vs NMGX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCHF is a Hold and NMGX is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MXCHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMGX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MXCHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NMGX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MXCHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMGX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MXCHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NMGX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MXCHF (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а +2.74% price change this week, while NMGX (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +29.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.03%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.37%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (+0.12% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.86% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| MXCHF | NMGX | MXCHF / NMGX | |
| Capitalization | 1.79B | 9.47M | 18,896% |
| EBITDA | 1.06B | -3.68M | -28,698% |
| Gain YTD | 35.890 | 44.222 | 81% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.56 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 7.45B | 2.56M | 291,389% |
| Total Cash | 861M | 38.7K | 2,224,806% |
| Total Debt | 5.8B | 1.16M | 499,569% |
MXCHF | NMGX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MXCHF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NMGX (82). This means that MXCHF’s stock grew significantly faster than NMGX’s over the last 12 months.
MXCHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NMGX (100). This means that MXCHF’s stock grew similarly to NMGX’s over the last 12 months.
MXCHF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as NMGX (100). This means that MXCHF’s stock grew similarly to NMGX’s over the last 12 months.
MXCHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NMGX (47). This means that MXCHF’s stock grew similarly to NMGX’s over the last 12 months.
MXCHF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as NMGX (100). This means that MXCHF’s stock grew similarly to NMGX’s over the last 12 months.
| MXCHF | NMGX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
MXCHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MXCHF and ARKAF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MXCHF and ARKAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MXCHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MXCHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ARKAF - MXCHF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NDEKF - MXCHF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NNCHY - MXCHF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NDEKY - MXCHF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| MXCHY - MXCHF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NMGX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NMGX and NNOMF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMGX and NNOMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMGX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMGX | 100% | N/A | ||
| NNOMF - NMGX | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| NDEKY - NMGX | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| MXCHY - NMGX | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MXCHF - NMGX | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SLSN - NMGX | -0% Poorly correlated | -3.54% | ||
More | ||||