Advertisement
MXCHY vs SLSN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCHY is a Hold and SLSN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MXCHY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLSN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MXCHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SLSN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MXCHY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLSN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MXCHY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SLSN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
MXCHY (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а +9.66% price change this week, while SLSN (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -11.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.97%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2709.82%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (+1.87% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Household/Personal Care (-2.54% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| MXCHY | SLSN | MXCHY / SLSN | |
| Capitalization | 1.92B | 133M | 1,443% |
| EBITDA | 992M | 7.29M | 13,615% |
| Gain YTD | 22.152 | -22.636 | -98% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.97 | 189.00 | 4% |
| Revenue | 7.52B | 64.4M | 11,683% |
| Total Cash | 993M | 4.11M | 24,172% |
| Total Debt | 5.83B | 26.3M | 22,171% |
MXCHY | SLSN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 95 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MXCHY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLSN (92). This means that MXCHY’s stock grew significantly faster than SLSN’s over the last 12 months.
SLSN's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as MXCHY (100). This means that SLSN’s stock grew similarly to MXCHY’s over the last 12 months.
SLSN's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MXCHY (92). This means that SLSN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MXCHY’s over the last 12 months.
MXCHY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLSN (95). This means that MXCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLSN’s over the last 12 months.
SLSN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MXCHY (96). This means that SLSN’s stock grew significantly faster than MXCHY’s over the last 12 months.
| MXCHY | SLSN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 55% | 7 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 89% |
Advertisement
MXCHY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MXCHY and NDEKY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MXCHY and NDEKY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MXCHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MXCHY | 100% | +10.29% | ||
| NDEKY - MXCHY | 15% Poorly correlated | -4.14% | ||
| MXCHF - MXCHY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NMGX - MXCHY | 4% Poorly correlated | +12.49% | ||
| SLSN - MXCHY | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| NNOMF - MXCHY | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
More | ||||
SLSN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SLSN and ELF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLSN and ELF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLSN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLSN | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| ELF - SLSN | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
| NWL - SLSN | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| GROV - SLSN | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.24% | ||
| HNST - SLSN | 12% Poorly correlated | +10.08% | ||
| EWCZ - SLSN | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||