MXGBF vs REMYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXGBF is a Hold and REMYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MXGBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileREMYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MXGBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- REMYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MXGBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REMYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MXGBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
- REMYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MXGBF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while REMYF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was +2.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.32%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Alcoholic (-1.15% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
| MXGBF | REMYF | MXGBF / REMYF | |
| Capitalization | 15.2B | 8.68B | 175% |
| EBITDA | 774M | 476M | 163% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -5.629 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 22.60 | 27.32 | 83% |
| Revenue | 10.8B | 1.54B | 704% |
| Total Cash | 328M | 95M | 345% |
| Total Debt | 6.59B | 443M | 1,488% |
MXGBF | REMYF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MXGBF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as REMYF (42). This means that MXGBF’s stock grew similarly to REMYF’s over the last 12 months.
MXGBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as REMYF (100). This means that MXGBF’s stock grew similarly to REMYF’s over the last 12 months.
MXGBF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as REMYF (89). This means that MXGBF’s stock grew similarly to REMYF’s over the last 12 months.
MXGBF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for REMYF (86). This means that MXGBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than REMYF’s over the last 12 months.
MXGBF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as REMYF (85). This means that MXGBF’s stock grew similarly to REMYF’s over the last 12 months.
| MXGBF | REMYF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 13% | 4 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 26% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 20% | 4 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 22% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 27% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 8% | 4 days ago 38% |
MXGBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MXGBF and TAP have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MXGBF and TAP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MXGBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MXGBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TAP - MXGBF | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.67% | ||
| REMYY - MXGBF | 9% Poorly correlated | -5.79% | ||
| REMYF - MXGBF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.71% | ||
| SRSG - MXGBF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| STBFF - MXGBF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
REMYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REMYF has been loosely correlated with REMYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if REMYF jumps, then REMYY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To REMYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REMYF | 100% | -2.71% | ||
| REMYY - REMYF | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.79% | ||
| PRNDY - REMYF | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| PDRDF - REMYF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| CRHKY - REMYF | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.19% | ||
| DGEAF - REMYF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.51% | ||
More | ||||