Both MYRG and STRL operate in the high-growth infrastructure construction sector, benefiting from U.S. investments in power grids, data centers, and transportation under initiatives like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning in the current environment of rising energy demand and digital expansion. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing long-term sector growth will find value in evaluating their relative strengths amid volatile market conditions and strong quarterly results.
MYRG, a specialty electrical contractor founded in 1891, provides transmission and distribution (T&D) services for utilities, along with commercial and industrial (C&I) electrical installations across the U.S. and Canada. In recent market activity, shares have surged over 114% year-to-date and 206% over the past year, reaching around $469 per share with a $7.3 billion market cap. Q1 2026 results showcased record revenues of $1 billion (up 20% YoY), net income of $46.8 million (EPS $2.99, beating estimates by 46%), and EBITDA of $81.5 million, with gross margins expanding to 13.4% due to improved T&D (9.7%) and C&I (8.1%) profitability. A record $2.84 billion backlog signals robust demand for clean energy, EV infrastructure, and grid upgrades. Sentiment has shifted positively on margin recovery and utility spending, though project inefficiencies pose minor risks.
STRL, founded in 1955, delivers e-infrastructure, transportation, and building solutions, emphasizing data centers, manufacturing, and civil projects. Recent weeks have seen explosive gains, with shares up 163% year-to-date and 384% over the past year, trading near $806 with a $24.7 billion market cap. Q1 2026 earnings smashed expectations with $826 million in revenue (up 92% YoY, beating by 41%), EPS of $3.59 (up 57% from estimates), and net income of $111 million, boosted by the CEC Facilities acquisition. E-infrastructure demand from hyperscalers drove growth, leading to raised full-year guidance. Positive sentiment stems from project wins and sector tailwinds, tempered by integration risks from M&A (mergers and acquisitions).
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds of bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current market conditions—based on real-time analysis of momentum, sectors, and volatility—earn a spot in this dynamic section, which currently highlights 25 out of 351 total bots. Performance stats impress: annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.7, with standouts in semiconductors (+95% annualized, 63% win rate), industrials (+93%, 67% win rate), and small-caps (+92%, 58% win rate). These bots employ diverse strategies like trend-following and sector rotation over timeframes from 15 minutes to days. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify tools aligned with your trading style.
MYRG and STRL share infrastructure exposure but diverge in focus: MYRG specializes in utility T&D (60% of revenues from master service agreements), offering stability via recurring maintenance and a massive backlog, while STRL leverages e-infrastructure for data centers and manufacturing, driving hyper-growth (92% Q1 revenue surge) but higher volatility (beta 1.64). Growth drivers include grid modernization for MYRG and hyperscaler demand for STRL. Recent momentum favors STRL (YTD +163% vs. +114%), with superior net margins (11.65% vs. 3.71%) and ROE (33% vs. 22%). Risk factors: MYRG faces weather/project delays; STRL, acquisition integration. Sector sentiment tilts toward electrification and digital infra, positioning both favorably but STRL with greater upside trade-offs.
Tickeron’s AI would currently favor STRL due to superior trend consistency, explosive revenue growth, and stronger relative positioning in high-demand e-infrastructure amid data center booms. While MYRG offers reliable backlog visibility and margin stability, STRL's catalysts like raised guidance and acquisition synergies suggest higher probabilistic outperformance in the near term, barring sector downturns.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MYRG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTRL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MYRG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STRL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
MYRG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +6.76% price change this week, while STRL (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.60%.
MYRG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
STRL is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| MYRG | STRL | MYRG / STRL | |
| Capitalization | 7.28B | 26B | 28% |
| EBITDA | 266M | 590M | 45% |
| Gain YTD | 113.941 | 177.190 | 64% |
| P/E Ratio | 51.54 | 75.86 | 68% |
| Revenue | 3.83B | 2.89B | 133% |
| Total Cash | 163M | 512M | 32% |
| Total Debt | 61.5M | 342M | 18% |
MYRG | STRL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MYRG's Valuation (85) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STRL (93). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to STRL’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (5). This means that STRL’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's SMR Rating (27) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (42). This means that STRL’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (35). This means that STRL’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for MYRG (81). This means that STRL’s stock grew significantly faster than MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
| MYRG | STRL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 66% | 20 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 80% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MPG | 7.66 | 0.21 | +2.81% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long MP Daily ETF | |||
| BASG | 25.59 | -0.17 | -0.66% |
| Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF | |||
| LEO | 6.28 | -0.08 | -1.26% |
| BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals | |||
| INTF | 40.62 | -0.66 | -1.60% |
| iShares International Equity Factor ETF | |||
| STXK | 35.59 | -0.60 | -1.65% |
| Strive Small-Cap ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STRL has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STRL jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STRL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRL | 100% | -4.52% | ||
| FIX - STRL | 78% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| PWR - STRL | 76% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| IESC - STRL | 73% Closely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| MTZ - STRL | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.57% | ||
| EME - STRL | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||