Investors tracking the infrastructure and engineering sector have closely watched two standouts in recent quarters: Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Both companies operate at the intersection of electrification, data-center buildout, and critical infrastructure modernization — themes that have reshaped capital flows in the construction and engineering space. While Quanta Services is a $40-billion-plus market-cap industry leader with a vast portfolio spanning electric power, renewables, and underground utility work, Sterling Infrastructure has emerged as a high-growth mid-cap force, particularly in mission-critical E-Infrastructure. This comparison examines their recent performance, growth drivers, and relative positioning to help investors understand the trade-offs between scale and momentum in today's market.
Quanta Services (PWR) is one of the largest specialty contracting companies in North America, delivering infrastructure solutions across the electric power, renewable energy, communications, and pipeline industries. The company operates through two primary segments: Electric Infrastructure Solutions and Underground Utility and Infrastructure Solutions. In full-year 2025, PWR reported record consolidated revenues of $28.48 billion, a significant jump from the prior year, along with adjusted diluted EPS of $10.75 and net income attributable to common stock of $1.03 billion. Cash flow from operations reached $2.23 billion.
What has driven sentiment in recent weeks is the sheer scale of PWR's backlog. The company ended the year with a record total backlog of $43.98 billion and remaining performance obligations (RPO) of $23.76 billion — figures that reflect accelerating demand in the Electric segment. Major project wins, including a landmark engagement with NiSource to design, procure, and construct approximately 3 gigawatts of power generation and grid infrastructure for a large load customer, have reinforced confidence in the company's multi-year revenue visibility. Strategic acquisitions — such as the $1.35 billion purchase of Dynamic Systems, a premier mechanical and process infrastructure provider — have expanded PWR's addressable market into high-growth technology, semiconductor, and healthcare verticals. A credit rating upgrade from S&P Global Ratings to BBB further underscores the company's improving financial profile.
Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) is a Texas-based infrastructure company focused on three segments: E-Infrastructure Solutions, Transportation Solutions, and Building Solutions. The company has undergone a notable transformation in recent years, shifting its portfolio toward higher-margin, mission-critical projects — particularly large-scale data centers, advanced manufacturing facilities, and semiconductor installations. For full-year 2025, STRL posted revenues of $2.49 billion, up 32% on an adjusted basis when excluding the deconsolidated RHB joint venture. Adjusted net income surged 53% to $336.7 million, or $10.88 per diluted share, while adjusted EBITDA rose 47% to $503.8 million.
The fourth quarter of 2025 highlighted the power of STRL's repositioning. E-Infrastructure revenues soared 123% year over year, fueled by strong organic growth and contributions from the CEC Facilities Group acquisition, which brought mission-critical electrical and mechanical capabilities into the fold. Mission-critical work — defined as data center, manufacturing, and semiconductor projects — represented 84% of the E-Infrastructure backlog at year-end. Transportation Solutions also delivered robust results, with 24% revenue growth and 103% adjusted operating income growth driven by strength in Rocky Mountain markets. Offsetting these gains, the Building Solutions segment continued to face headwinds from a sluggish U.S. housing market, with revenues declining 9%. Looking ahead, STRL issued full-year 2026 revenue guidance of $3.05 billion to $3.20 billion and adjusted EPS guidance of $13.45 to $14.05, signaling continued momentum.
For investors seeking a data-driven edge in navigating comparisons like this one, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with the current market environment earn a place in this featured section. These bots span diverse trading styles — from swing trading and trend following to mean reversion and breakout strategies — and operate across different timeframes, risk profiles, and sector concentrations. Many of the featured bots showcase annualized return figures ranging from the mid-teens to well over 30%, with track records that can be analyzed in detail through transparent performance metrics, trade-by-trade logs, and statistical summaries. Whether an investor is evaluating PWR, STRL, or the broader infrastructure sector, exploring the Trending AI Robots section may help reveal which tickers the algorithms currently favor.
The most striking contrast between PWR and STRL is one of scale. PWR generated over $28 billion in 2025 revenue — more than 11 times STRL's $2.49 billion. Quanta's $43.98 billion backlog dwarfs Sterling's $3.01 billion, reflecting a fundamentally different scope of operations. Yet on percentage growth metrics, STRL holds the advantage: its 53% adjusted net income growth and 47% adjusted EBITDA growth outpaced PWR's already-impressive double-digit gains. Sterling's adjusted EBITDA margin exceeding 20% also marks a level of profitability that PWR, given its lower-margin utility-scale work, does not match.
From a business-model perspective, PWR benefits from deep, entrenched relationships with regulated utilities and large power consumers, giving it a more defensive posture and recession-resistant revenue streams. STRL leans more heavily on the secular boom in data-center and advanced manufacturing construction — a higher-growth but potentially more cyclical end market. In terms of risk, PWR must navigate permitting delays, supply chain complexity, and macroeconomic uncertainty at a vast operational scale, while STRL contends with the ongoing drag from its Building Solutions residential exposure and the integration risk associated with the CEC acquisition. Market sentiment in recent weeks has been broadly positive for both names, but STRL shares have exhibited greater volatility, consistent with a mid-cap growth profile.
Based on observable factors — including trend consistency, backlog growth trajectory, margin expansion, and relative market positioning — Tickeron's AI framework would likely lean toward Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) in the current environment, while acknowledging Quanta Services (PWR) as the more defensive and institutionally anchored choice. The AI would likely favor STRL for its superior earnings momentum, expanding margins, and concentrated exposure to the data-center mega-cycle, which continues to show strong and sustained demand signals. However, this preference is probabilistic rather than absolute. PWR offers a broader, more resilient revenue base and a backlog so large it provides exceptional long-term visibility — qualities that may appeal to a different set of algorithmic strategies focused on stability and lower drawdown risk. The choice between these two stocks ultimately depends on whether an AI model prioritizes growth velocity or scale-driven durability in its selection criteria.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PWR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTRL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PWR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STRL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
PWR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -3.29% price change this week, while STRL (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +2.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.45%.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
STRL is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| PWR | STRL | PWR / STRL | |
| Capitalization | 95.9B | 21.3B | 450% |
| EBITDA | 2.71B | 590M | 459% |
| Gain YTD | 51.540 | 126.758 | 41% |
| P/E Ratio | 87.68 | 62.06 | 141% |
| Revenue | 30.1B | 2.89B | 1,043% |
| Total Cash | 250M | 512M | 49% |
| Total Debt | 6.32B | 342M | 1,848% |
PWR | STRL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PWR's Valuation (88) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STRL (91). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to STRL’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STRL (25). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to STRL’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's SMR Rating (28) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (63). This means that STRL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (45). This means that STRL’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (23). This means that STRL’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
| PWR | STRL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 58% | 6 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STRL has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STRL jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STRL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRL | 100% | +6.79% | ||
| FIX - STRL | 69% Closely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| IESC - STRL | 67% Closely correlated | +4.33% | ||
| ECG - STRL | 66% Closely correlated | +3.47% | ||
| PWR - STRL | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| EME - STRL | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.18% | ||
More | ||||