PWR
Price
$680.59
Change
+$2.57 (+0.38%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
101.94B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STRL
Price
$551.67
Change
+$2.72 (+0.50%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.79B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PWR vs STRL

PWR vs STRL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Quanta Services (PWR) vs. Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Quanta Services (PWR) and Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) both operate in the infrastructure and construction sector, with exposure to electric power, utilities, and data center-related projects.
  • Recent market activity shows PWR benefiting from guidance raises tied to record backlog and acquisitions, supporting steady price appreciation over recent weeks.
  • STRL has demonstrated strong revenue growth from prior quarters and announced an expanded credit facility, alongside scheduled second-quarter results expected soon.
  • Both stocks exhibit momentum linked to infrastructure spending and data center demand, though they differ in scale, diversification, and recent catalysts.
  • Sector sentiment remains positive amid broader capital expenditure trends, with relative performance influenced by backlog visibility and operational execution.
  • Market positioning highlights trade-offs between PWR’s larger established operations and STRL’s higher growth trajectory in targeted segments.

Introduction

Quanta Services (PWR) and Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) represent two publicly traded companies in the infrastructure solutions space, each with distinct business profiles and market exposures. This comparison examines their recent performance, operational developments, and relative positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating opportunities in the sector. The analysis focuses on observable factors such as backlog trends, earnings momentum, and sector tailwinds that may interest those monitoring infrastructure and construction equities. Readers seeking data-driven context on these names within the current market environment will find the overview relevant for portfolio considerations or trading strategies.

PWR Overview and Recent Performance

Quanta Services (PWR) provides infrastructure solutions primarily for electric power, oil and gas, communications, pipeline, and energy industries. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience amid positive developments, including a guidance raise supported by record backlog levels and strategic acquisitions. Broader timeframe references indicate consistent investor interest tied to utility and power infrastructure demand. Sentiment has been influenced by these operational milestones, contributing to measured price appreciation over recent weeks without extreme volatility. The company’s diversified exposure across multiple end markets provides a buffer relative to more concentrated peers, supporting steady positioning amid fluctuating macroeconomic conditions.

STRL Overview and Recent Performance

Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) focuses on infrastructure construction, including e-infrastructure solutions that have benefited from data center expansion. Recent developments include an extension and expansion of its credit facility to $1.5 billion in early July, enhancing financial flexibility. The company also scheduled its second-quarter 2026 earnings release for August 3, 2026, following record first-quarter results reported earlier in the year. Market activity over recent weeks reflects continued attention to growth in targeted segments, with sentiment shaped by backlog strength and operational execution. These factors have contributed to relative stability alongside broader sector trends.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a broader universe of hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to current market conditions. Only the most suitable options, based on backtested results and adaptability, earn placement in this trending section. Available bots span a wide range of statistics, including win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles across diverse trading styles. This resource provides traders with insights into automated approaches that align with evolving market dynamics. Explore the Trending AI Robots page for additional details on active strategies.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Quanta Services (PWR) operates at a larger scale with broader diversification across utility, energy, and communications infrastructure, while Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) maintains a more focused emphasis on e-infrastructure and data center projects. Recent momentum for PWR has centered on backlog expansion and acquisition-driven growth, contrasting with STRL’s credit facility enhancements and prior-quarter revenue surges. Risk factors differ as well: PWR’s size may offer greater stability, whereas STRL’s concentrated exposure introduces higher sensitivity to specific project cycles. Sector exposure overlaps in infrastructure spending, yet market sentiment reflects PWR’s established track record versus STRL’s accelerated expansion phase. Trade-offs include PWR’s potentially steadier relative performance against STRL’s higher-growth profile in niche areas.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in backlog visibility, operational catalysts, and relative positioning within the infrastructure sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to Quanta Services (PWR). The company’s recent guidance adjustments and diversified revenue streams suggest more consistent momentum compared to peers. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to ongoing market data rather than definitive forecasts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PWR vs. STRL commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWR is a Buy and STRL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2026
Stock price -- (PWR: $678.02 vs. STRL: $548.95)
Brand notoriety: PWR and STRL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PWR: 80% vs. STRL: 51%
Market capitalization -- PWR: $101.94B vs. STRL: $16.79B
PWR [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $101.94B. STRL’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $16.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $8.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PWR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTRL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STRL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PWR and STRL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STRL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PWR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • STRL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PWR and STRL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PWR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while STRL (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +2.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

STRL is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.75% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($102B) has a higher market cap than STRL($16.8B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than STRL: PWR (77.58) vs STRL (39.55). STRL YTD gains are higher at: 79.261 vs. PWR (60.743). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.08B vs. STRL (590M). STRL (512M) and PWR (506M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . STRL has less debt than PWR: STRL (342M) vs PWR (6.6B). PWR has higher revenues than STRL: PWR (32.9B) vs STRL (2.89B).
PWRSTRLPWR / STRL
Capitalization102B16.8B607%
EBITDA3.08B590M522%
Gain YTD60.74379.26177%
P/E Ratio77.5839.55196%
Revenue32.9B2.89B1,140%
Total Cash506M512M99%
Total Debt6.6B342M1,931%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PWR vs STRL: Fundamental Ratings
PWR
STRL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3011
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1547
SMR RATING
1..100
5629
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2532
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STRL's Valuation (83) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (86). This means that STRL’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STRL (47). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to STRL’s over the last 12 months.

STRL's SMR Rating (29) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (56). This means that STRL’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STRL (61). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to STRL’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STRL (32). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to STRL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWRSTRL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STRL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMSR5.810.14
+2.47%
Terrestrial Energy Inc.
SHAK72.861.09
+1.52%
Shake Shack
NFE0.33N/A
-0.09%
New Fortress Energy
VIV11.58-0.06
-0.52%
Telefonica Brasil SA
EEIQ2.52-0.15
-5.62%
EpicQuest Education Group International Limited

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MYRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MYRG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
+1.11%
MYRG - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
FIX - PWR
78%
Closely correlated
+3.01%
MTZ - PWR
74%
Closely correlated
+3.10%
EME - PWR
69%
Closely correlated
+2.02%
ECG - PWR
69%
Closely correlated
+4.10%
More

STRL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STRL has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STRL jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STRL
1D Price
Change %
STRL100%
+3.04%
FIX - STRL
73%
Closely correlated
+3.01%
PWR - STRL
68%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
ECG - STRL
66%
Closely correlated
+4.10%
EME - STRL
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
IESC - STRL
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
More