PWR
Price
$653.00
Change
+$31.82 (+5.12%)
Updated
Nov 3, 04:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
93.39B
114 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STRL
Price
$361.02
Change
+$25.57 (+7.62%)
Updated
Nov 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.26B
118 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PWR vs STRL

PWR vs STRL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Quanta Services (PWR) vs. Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both stocks are AI-infrastructure beneficiaries, but they occupy different positions: PWR is the scale leader in electric power and grid construction, while STRL is a faster-growing, data-center-focused e-infrastructure specialist.
  • Growth profiles differ sharply. STRL posted roughly 90% revenue growth in recent quarters, while PWR grew revenue in the 26%–41% range, reflecting a steadier but more diversified base.
  • Backlog visibility is strong for both. PWR holds a record backlog in the tens of billions, while STRL has expanded its signed and combined backlog dramatically year over year.
  • Risk profiles diverge. STRL carries concentration risk in mission-critical data-center work and faces housing-market headwinds, while PWR faces execution and permitting risks across a broader project mix.
  • For further detail on these tickers' headlines and intraday activity, explore PWR Major News and PWR Today's Price Move, as well as STRL Major News and STRL Today's Price Move.
  • To see how automated strategies are positioning across this market, explore Trending AI Robots.

Introduction

Investors tracking the artificial-intelligence infrastructure buildout increasingly focus on the companies supplying the power, data-center, and mission-critical construction behind it. Quanta Services (PWR) and Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) are two prominent names in this theme, yet their market positioning and growth dynamics differ meaningfully. This stock comparison is relevant for traders and investors seeking to understand relative performance, growth drivers, and risk trade-offs between an established industry leader and a faster-growing specialist. Both companies have delivered strong recent results, but their paths to value creation are not identical.

PWR Overview and Recent Performance

Quanta Services (PWR) is the United States' largest electrical infrastructure construction and services company, providing engineering, construction, and maintenance for electric transmission, substations, power generation, and large-load facilities. Recent market activity has reflected robust demand across utility, power-generation, and data-center markets. In recent quarters, revenue accelerated meaningfully, and the company repeatedly raised its full-year guidance. Quanta's total backlog reached record levels — reported at roughly $53 billion in its latest quarter — providing substantial revenue visibility. Recent acquisitions, including Phalcon, Enerfab, Percheron, and PSD, have broadened its power-generation and fabrication capabilities. Sentiment has been supported by the "power supercycle" and AI-driven electricity demand, though the stock's premium valuation and exposure to permitting, supply-chain, and execution risks remain key considerations for investors.

STRL Overview and Recent Performance

Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) is a Texas-based infrastructure services provider focused on E-Infrastructure Solutions, Transportation Solutions, and Building Solutions. Its growth has been driven overwhelmingly by mission-critical work — primarily data-center campuses and semiconductor fabrication — with mission-critical projects representing more than 90% of the E-Infrastructure segment's signed backlog in recent periods. Revenue has roughly doubled year over year in recent quarters, and signed and combined backlog have surged, with management citing more than $7 billion of total visible work including high-probability future phases. Acquisitions such as CEC Facilities Group and Stone Ridge have expanded electrical and site-development capacity. However, the Building Solutions segment remains a headwind amid housing-affordability pressures, and the company has experienced notable share-price volatility, including a sharp pullback in recent weeks before a rebound as investors weighed demand sustainability against execution risks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron operates a large marketplace of AI-powered trading bots covering thousands of individual tickers, each built around a distinct strategy, timeframe, risk profile, and performance track record. Because not every automated strategy suits every market regime, Tickeron curates a focused Trending AI Robots section highlighting the bots currently best aligned with prevailing market conditions. These bots employ varied approaches — from swing-trading and momentum models to longer-horizon trend-following systems — across diverse sets of tickers, with each bot accompanied by historical performance statistics and key metrics. Traders comparing names like PWR and STRL can use these tools to observe how algorithmic strategies are positioning in real time. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to review the current lineup.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The core contrast between these two names is scale versus growth rate. PWR is a diversified, multi-billion-dollar leader with a steadier growth profile, broad utility relationships, and unmatched project visibility, but its forward earnings multiple reflects premium pricing for that scale. STRL offers a more explosive growth trajectory tied directly to hyperscale data centers and semiconductors, but that concentration also magnifies sensitivity to any slowdown in mission-critical capital spending. Both carry execution and labor-capacity risks, though STRL also contends with a weak residential segment and lumpy award timing, while PWR faces permitting and weather-related variability across a larger, more diverse book of work. In terms of market positioning, PWR offers breadth and stability, whereas STRL offers higher-octane, more concentrated exposure to AI infrastructure demand.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, backlog visibility, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely view both names favorably but for different reasons. PWR demonstrates a steadier trend profile, broader diversification, and consistent guidance raises, which tend to support stability-focused strategies. STRL, by contrast, exhibits stronger momentum and faster growth, but also higher volatility and greater concentration risk. The AI's preference would therefore depend on the strategy's objective: a trend-following, lower-volatility model might lean toward PWR for its relative consistency, while a momentum-oriented model could favor STRL for its outsized growth, accepting greater risk in return. These are probabilistic assessments of current conditions rather than definitive forecasts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PWR vs. STRL commentary
Nov 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWR is a Buy and STRL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for PWR with price predictions
Nov 02, 2026

PWR's RSI Indicator recovers from oversold territory

The RSI Oscillator for PWR moved out of oversold territory on October 26, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 16 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 15 of the 16 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PWR as a result. In 65 of 81 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PWR just turned positive on November 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where PWR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 35 of 51 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.

Following a +9.74% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PWR advanced for three days, in 258 of 348 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.

PWR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 255 of 362 cases where PWR Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 70%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.

PWR moved below its 50-day moving average on October 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for PWR crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 7 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 54%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PWR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 17 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 40 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PWR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (9.690) is normal, around the industry mean (15.267). P/E Ratio (70.032) is within average values for comparable stocks, (166.907). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.443) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.001) settles around the average of (0.198) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.860) is also within normal values, averaging (2.856).

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for STRL with price predictions
Nov 02, 2026

STRL's RSI Indicator sits in oversold zone for 1 day

It is expected that a price bounce should occur soon.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 15 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a +7.80% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where STRL advanced for three days, in 287 of 352 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.

STRL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 264 of 311 cases where STRL Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 85%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on STRL as a result. In 66 of 88 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for STRL turned negative on October 14, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 31 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 74%.

STRL moved below its 50-day moving average on October 09, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for STRL crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where STRL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 27 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 66 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (7.560) is normal, around the industry mean (15.267). P/E Ratio (23.808) is within average values for comparable stocks, (166.907). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.611) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.198) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.365) is also within normal values, averaging (2.856).

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 68 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. STRL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 83 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. STRL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PWR vs STRL: Fundamental Ratings
PWR
STRL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7463
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1768
SMR RATING
1..100
5627
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5684
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4083
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STRL's Valuation (66) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (85). This means that STRL’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STRL (68). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than STRL’s over the last 12 months.

STRL's SMR Rating (27) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (56). This means that STRL’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STRL (84). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to STRL’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STRL (83). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than STRL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWRSTRL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 03, 2026
Stock price -- (PWR: $621.18 vs. STRL: $335.45)
Brand notoriety: PWR and STRL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PWR: 123% vs. STRL: 153%
Market capitalization -- PWR: $93.39B vs. STRL: $10.26B
PWR [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $93.39B. STRL’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $10.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $69 to $2.15T. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PWR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while STRL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PWR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STRL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the long-term than STRL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STRL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PWR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STRL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than STRL.

Price Growth

PWR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +10.15% price change this week, while STRL (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -7.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +5.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -25.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

PWR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2027.

STRL is expected to report earnings on Mar 01, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+5.73% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

View a ticker or compare two or three
PWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STRL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
+0.07%
FIX - PWR
83%
Closely correlated
-2.64%
EME - PWR
76%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
MYRG - PWR
76%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
ECG - PWR
72%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
MTZ - PWR
71%
Closely correlated
+4.14%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMZP24.180.50
+2.10%
Kurv Yield Prem Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP)
WOOD65.790.54
+0.82%
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD)
SH33.030.17
+0.52%
ProShares Short S&P500 (SH)
KNGZ43.520.16
+0.38%
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ)
IWR110.320.29
+0.26%
iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR)