It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NABZY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSVNLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NABZY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVNLY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
NABZY (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while SVNLY (@Major Banks) price change was -1.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.32%.
NABZY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
SVNLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
NABZY | SVNLY | NABZY / SVNLY | |
Capitalization | 59.6B | 17.4B | 343% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 28.411 | 3.633 | 782% |
P/E Ratio | 12.52 | 7.17 | 175% |
Revenue | 19.9B | 57B | 35% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 139B | 1.6T | 9% |
NABZY | SVNLY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SVNLY's Valuation (92) in the null industry is in the same range as NABZY (96). This means that SVNLY’s stock grew similarly to NABZY’s over the last 12 months.
NABZY's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLY (52). This means that NABZY’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.
SVNLY's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as NABZY (3). This means that SVNLY’s stock grew similarly to NABZY’s over the last 12 months.
NABZY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLY (47). This means that NABZY’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.
NABZY's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLY (74). This means that NABZY’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.
NABZY | SVNLY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago47% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago56% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago52% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago66% | 5 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago55% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NABZY has been closely correlated with CMWAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NABZY jumps, then CMWAY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NABZY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NABZY | 100% | +0.54% | ||
CMWAY - NABZY | 76% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
ANZGY - NABZY | 70% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
RY - NABZY | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
NTB - NABZY | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
BMO - NABZY | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVNLY has been loosely correlated with SVNLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVNLY jumps, then SVNLF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SVNLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SVNLY | 100% | +0.60% | ||
SVNLF - SVNLY | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
RY - SVNLY | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
ING - SVNLY | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
NABZY - SVNLY | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
SCBFY - SVNLY | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More |