Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NACCX vs TFBVX
NACCX vs TFBVX Comparison
Open Charts NACCX vs TFBVX
Nuveen MD Municipal Bond C
Price$9.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.98M
T. Rowe Price Virginia Tax Free Bond I
Price$10.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
NACCX vs TFBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NACCX vs. TFBVX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NACCX is a Hold and TFBVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBVX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. NACCX (234M). TFBVX pays higher dividends than NACCX: TFBVX (3.19) vs NACCX (2.72). NACCX was incepted earlier than TFBVX: NACCX (12 years) vs TFBVX (8 years). NACCX (1.63) is less costly to investors than TFBVX (0.42). NACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. TFBVX (19.10). NACCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBVX: NACCX (2500) vs TFBVX (500000). TFBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.46 vs. NACCX (-1.75). TFBVX return over 5 years is better than : 0.22 vs. NACCX (-3.46).
| NACCX | TFBVX | NACCX / TFBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.42 | 371% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.42 | 388% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.796 | -1.877 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 1.29B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 3.19 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | -1.46 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.11 | 7.21 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.46 | 0.22 | -1,558% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement