Ad is loading...
NADCX vs ONCFX
NADCX vs ONCFX Comparison
Open Charts NADCX vs ONCFX
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Cnsrv A
Price$9.11
Change-$0.18 (-1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.34M
JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth I
Price$12.26
Change-$0.21 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.9B
NADCX vs ONCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NADCX vs. ONCFX commentary
Apr 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NADCX is a Sell and ONCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONCFX has more cash in the bank: 3.9B vs. NADCX (214M). ONCFX pays higher dividends than NADCX: ONCFX (3.59) vs NADCX (3.17). NADCX was incepted earlier than ONCFX: NADCX (25 years) vs ONCFX (28 years). NADCX (0.83) is less costly to investors than ONCFX (0.69). NADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.30 vs. ONCFX (8.00). NADCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ONCFX: NADCX (2000) vs ONCFX (1000000). ONCFX IRA initial investment is lower compared to NADCX: ONCFX (1000000) vs NADCX (1000). ONCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.42 vs. NADCX (-3.57). NADCX (22.23) and ONCFX (21.24) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NADCX | ONCFX | NADCX / ONCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.69 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.69 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.301 | -0.894 | 258% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Net Assets | 214M | 3.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 3.59 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.57 | 2.42 | -147% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.14 | 2.36 | -133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.23 | 21.24 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.98 | 19.47 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...