Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAEFX vs RSLAX
NAEFX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts NAEFX vs RSLAX
New Alternatives Investor
Price$69.64
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.17M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R1
Price$58.76
Change+$0.39 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
NAEFX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAEFX vs. RSLAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAEFX is a Hold and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. NAEFX (259M). NAEFX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: NAEFX (1.54) vs RSLAX (0.07). NAEFX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: NAEFX (10 years) vs RSLAX (23 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than NAEFX (1.28). RSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NAEFX (5.94). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAEFX: RSLAX (250) vs NAEFX (3500). NAEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.80 vs. RSLAX (4.00). NAEFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.81 vs. RSLAX (11.80).
| NAEFX | RSLAX | NAEFX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.74 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.74 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.293 | 3.414 | 448% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3500 | 250 | 1,400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 259M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 0.07 | 2,101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.80 | 4.00 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.52 | 14.38 | -80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.81 | 11.80 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.17 | 26.00 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement