Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAEFX vs RSLAX
NAEFX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts NAEFX vs RSLAX
New Alternatives Investor
Price$71.88
Change-$1.14 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.61M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R1
Price$62.02
Change-$0.49 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.59B
NAEFX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAEFX vs. RSLAX commentary
Sep 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAEFX is a StrongBuy and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 80.6B vs. NAEFX (268M). NAEFX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: NAEFX (1.45) vs RSLAX (0.11). NAEFX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: NAEFX (11 years) vs RSLAX (23 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than NAEFX (1.28). RSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NAEFX (5.94). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAEFX: RSLAX (250) vs NAEFX (3500). NAEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.92 vs. RSLAX (6.17). RSLAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.62 vs. NAEFX (5.59).
| NAEFX | RSLAX | NAEFX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.74 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.74 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.854 | 9.196 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3500 | 250 | 1,400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 80.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.11 | 1,375% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.92 | 6.17 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.22 | 30.81 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.59 | 8.62 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.20 | 44.76 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement