Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAEFX vs RSLBX
NAEFX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts NAEFX vs RSLBX
New Alternatives Investor
Price$72.82
Change+$0.26 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.15M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$61.59
Change+$0.23 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.11B
NAEFX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAEFX vs. RSLBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAEFX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. NAEFX (267M). NAEFX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: NAEFX (1.46) vs RSLBX (0.06). NAEFX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: NAEFX (11 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than NAEFX (1.28). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NAEFX (5.94). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAEFX: RSLBX (250) vs NAEFX (3500). NAEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.03 vs. RSLBX (14.19). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 8.15 vs. NAEFX (6.14).
| NAEFX | RSLBX | NAEFX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.75 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.75 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.093 | 8.059 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3500 | 250 | 1,400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.06 | 2,501% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.03 | 14.19 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.65 | 20.53 | -42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.14 | 8.15 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.71 | 33.08 | 232% |