Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAEFX vs RSLBX
NAEFX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts NAEFX vs RSLBX
New Alternatives Investor
Price$73.04
Change+$0.68 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.21M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$61.32
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.52B
NAEFX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAEFX vs. RSLBX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAEFX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 78.5B vs. NAEFX (267M). NAEFX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: NAEFX (1.47) vs RSLBX (0.06). NAEFX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: NAEFX (11 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than NAEFX (1.28). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NAEFX (5.94). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAEFX: RSLBX (250) vs NAEFX (3500). NAEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.22 vs. RSLBX (9.82). NAEFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.45 vs. RSLBX (14.67).
| NAEFX | RSLBX | NAEFX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.75 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.75 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.762 | 7.586 | 261% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3500 | 250 | 1,400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267M | 78.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 0.06 | 2,537% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.22 | 9.82 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.25 | 31.39 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.45 | 14.67 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.48 | 30.30 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement