Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
NAEFX vs RSLBX
NAEFX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts NAEFX vs RSLBX
New Alternatives Investor
Price$64.09
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$57.86
Change-$0.72 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NAEFX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAEFX vs. RSLBX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAEFX is a Sell and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. NAEFX (263M). NAEFX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: NAEFX (2.92) vs RSLBX (0.15). NAEFX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: NAEFX (10 years) vs RSLBX (22 years). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NAEFX (7.97). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAEFX: RSLBX (250) vs NAEFX (3500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. NAEFX (7.01). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.11 vs. NAEFX (11.19).
| NAEFX | RSLBX | NAEFX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.272 | 3.064 | -74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3500 | 250 | 1,400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263M | 74.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 0.15 | 2,010% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 15.11 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.25 | -28.52 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.19 | 12.11 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.90 | - |