Ad is loading...
NAEFX vs RSLFX
NAEFX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts NAEFX vs RSLFX
New Alternatives Investor
Price$70.11
Change-$0.03 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$73.86
Change-$0.36 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAEFX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NAEFX vs. RSLFX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAEFX is a StrongBuy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 76.8B vs. NAEFX (295M). NAEFX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: NAEFX (2.92) vs RSLFX (0.87). NAEFX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: NAEFX (10 years) vs RSLFX (22 years). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NAEFX (7.97). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAEFX: RSLFX (250) vs NAEFX (3500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.02 vs. NAEFX (9.57). RSLFX (25.88) and NAEFX (25.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NAEFX | RSLFX | NAEFX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.526 | 4.844 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3500 | 250 | 1,400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 76.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 0.87 | 335% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 16.02 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.03 | -23.80 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.17 | 25.88 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...