Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSCX
NAESX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.90
Change+$0.07 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$20.43
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.49B
NAESX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSCX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and NMSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. NMSCX (2.49B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than NAESX: NMSCX (1.53) vs NAESX (1.35). NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). NMSCX (0.20) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: NMSCX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.72 vs. NMSCX (-9.82). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. NMSCX (14.89).
| NAESX | NMSCX | NAESX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.20 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.20 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.668 | -10.893 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 2.49B | 5,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.53 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | -9.82 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.61 | -9.33 | -360% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.96 | 14.89 | 409% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.39 | -7.14 | -1,281% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement