Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSCX
NAESX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.13
Change-$1.18 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$21.71
Change-$0.23 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
NAESX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSCX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and NMSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. NMSCX (2.62B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than NAESX: NMSCX (1.48) vs NAESX (1.28). NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). NMSCX (0.20) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: NMSCX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.75 vs. NMSCX (-8.48). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 68.85 vs. NMSCX (22.04).
| NAESX | NMSCX | NAESX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.20 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.20 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.006 | -5.403 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 2.62B | 5,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.48 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.75 | -8.48 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.57 | -2.13 | -1,768% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.85 | 22.04 | 312% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.46 | 0.43 | 24,214% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement