Ad is loading...
NAESX vs NMSCX
NAESX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$101.55
Change+$8.70 (+9.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$19.70
Change+$1.60 (+8.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
NAESX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and NMSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. NMSCX (2.24B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than NAESX: NMSCX (1.54) vs NAESX (1.39). NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). NMSCX (0.20) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: NMSCX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.70 vs. NMSCX (-25.49). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 56.35 vs. NMSCX (10.77).
| NAESX | NMSCX | NAESX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.20 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.20 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.296 | -21.133 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143B | 2.24B | 6,378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.54 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.70 | -25.49 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.18 | -29.80 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.35 | 10.77 | 523% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.14 | -17.43 | -362% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...