Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs QCSCX
NAESX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QCSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.67
Change+$0.22 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$22.43
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
NAESX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QCSCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and QCSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. QCSCX (1.44B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: NAESX (1.22) vs QCSCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). QCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QCSCX (1500) vs NAESX (3000). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.76 vs. NAESX (-0.55). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 39.03 vs. QCSCX (27.44).
| NAESX | QCSCX | NAESX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.00 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.00 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.218 | 6.810 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 1.44B | 11,258% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.55 | 4.76 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.75 | 35.37 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.03 | 27.44 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.66 | 58.85 | 207% |