Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs QCSCX
NAESX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QCSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.84
Change-$0.44 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$22.01
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.42B
NAESX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QCSCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and QCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. QCSCX (1.42B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: NAESX (1.25) vs QCSCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). QCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QCSCX (1500) vs NAESX (3000). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.20 vs. NAESX (9.15). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 57.53 vs. QCSCX (39.20).
| NAESX | QCSCX | NAESX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.99 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.99 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.494 | 5.000 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154B | 1.42B | 10,815% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.15 | 11.20 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.39 | 17.79 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.53 | 39.20 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.59 | 53.13 | 212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement