Ad is loading...
NAESX vs QSMLX
NAESX vs QSMLX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QSMLX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$107.04
Change+$1.67 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style I
Price$16.28
Change+$0.22 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.44M
NAESX vs QSMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QSMLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and QSMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. QSMLX (103M). QSMLX pays higher dividends than NAESX: QSMLX (1.67) vs NAESX (1.43). NAESX was incepted earlier than QSMLX: NAESX (65 years) vs QSMLX (12 years). QSMLX (0.74) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QSMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than QSMLX: NAESX (3000) vs QSMLX (5000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. QSMLX (-6.93). NAESX (65.08) and QSMLX (64.73) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NAESX | QSMLX | NAESX / QSMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.61 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.74 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.414 | -4.404 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 103M | 135,922% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.67 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | -6.93 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.27 | 10.83 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.08 | 64.73 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.81 | 32.60 | 269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...